Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />Within the Upper Basin, stocking plans have been created for only the razorback sucker <br />in the Colorado/Gunnison rivers in Colorado (Burdick et aI. 1995) and in the middle Green River <br />in Utah (Wydoski 1996), and for the bonytail in the Green and Colorado rivers in Utah (Lentsch <br />et al. 1996). These plans were developed when the Recovery Program designated razorback <br />sucker and bonytail as priorities one and two, respectively, for propagation and stocking due to <br />their extremely precarious status in the wild. These plans were superseded by stocking plans for <br />razorback sucker, bonytail, and Colorado pikeminnow in Colorado (Nesler 1998) and for <br />razorback sucker and bonytail in Utah (Hudson et aI. 1999). <br /> <br />Within Colorado in the Colorado and Gunnison rivers, numbers of wild razorback sucker <br />were insufficient for collection and use in a 5x5 breeding matrix to even attempt to develop <br />broodstock. Additionally, the highest number of razorback sucker remaining in Colorado, located <br />in Etter's Pond near Palisade, Colorado, was determined to be dominated by potential siblings <br />from a very small number of parents, and potentially hybridized with flannelmouth sucker <br />(Genetics Panel, Colorado River Recovery Program, 1994). Therefore, Diating crosses between <br />any two individual fish from Etter's Pond were detennined to be genetically unacceptable due to <br />inbreeding risks. The Recovery Program approved development of a "blended stock" of <br />razorback to serve as the broodstock for the Colorado and Gunnison rivers. This stock was <br />formed using razorback sucker from the Colorado River ann of Lake Powell (4 fish), the San Juan <br />ann of Lake Powell (4 fish), riverine:fish from the upper Colorado River (4 fish), and Etter Pond <br />(3 fish). A captive spawning strategy for these fish is described in Burdick et aI. (1995) following <br />the Recovery Program's Genetics Management Guidelines (Williamson and Wydoski 1994). <br /> <br />Bonytail are represented by only one captive broodstock that is currently kept at Dexter <br />National Fish Hatchery in New Mexico. Some of these fish are also being held at Wahweap State <br />Fish Hatchery in Utah for reintroduction and broodstock development purposes. Since these fish <br />are the descendants from limited numbers of wild fish taken from Lake Mohave, and no more <br />viable adult bonytail are currently available from the wild stock remaining in Lake Mohave, these <br />fish represent the only genetic material left from which to base a propagation and reintroduction <br />program. <br /> <br />For Colorado pikeminnow, broodstock development was initiated in 1991, and 17 family <br />lots currently exist from that effort. Due to the relatively "stable" status of Colorado pikeminnow <br />populations in Upper Basin rivers (McAda et al. 1994, McAda et aI. 1996, Czapla 1997), and the <br />limitations of hatchery and rearing facilities within the Program (Wydoski 1994, Czapla 1997), <br />no further broodstock development has occurred within the 5 x 5 breeding matrix, nor have any <br />stocking plans been developed to use progeny from the existing broodstock held at Horsethief <br />State Wildlife Area near Grand Junction, Colorado. This broodstock is currently being held at <br />Dexter National Fish Hatchery as a back-up. In 1998, the Biology Committee recommended and <br />the Recovery Program adopted the propagation strategy for pikeminnow progeny to be acquired <br />for Colorado and Gunnison River stocking requirements through the capture of wild adult <br /> <br />. <br />