My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9498
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9498
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:53:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9498
Author
Nesler, T. P.
Title
Stocking Plan for Endangered Coloraod River Fish Species.
USFW Year
2001.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br /> <br />Another consideration in maintaining population numbers and biomass of Colorado <br />pikeminnow is the biomass of available prey fish species. From Anderson (1997), a prey fish <br />biomass for the Palisade to Rifle reach of the Colorado River was estimated for the main channel <br />based on electrofishing results for fish < 300 mm in length, and for the backwater habitat based <br />on July 1994 seine results. The average main channel biomass for prey fish species was estimated <br />at 119 kg/mi. Main channel prey species were dominated by flannelmouth sucker, bluehead <br />sucker, roundtail chub, and white sucker. For backwater habitat in this reach, a prey fish <br />population estimate was extrapolated from the number of fish sampled, the backwater area <br />sampled, and the estimated total backwater area based on 53 backwaters recorded and measured <br />in the 52.6 mile reach. <br /> <br />The biomass of this population was estimated by partitioning based on the relative <br />abundance of each species, the fish size components for each species < or > 150 mm in length, <br />and calculating the weight of each size component using length-weight relationships calculated in <br />Anderson (1997) for each species. An average weight of 3 gm for a 64 pun fish (based on data <br />in Car lander 1969) was used for the biomass calculation for fathead minnow. This resulted in an <br />estimate of 539 kg/ha for 3.9 ha total of backwater habitat, or 40 kg/mi. Backwater prey species <br />were dominated by flannelmouth sucker, bluehead sucker, roundtail chub, white sucker, and <br />fathead minnow. A further extrapolation was made to estimate a mainchannel shoreline biomass <br />for prey species based on an assumptions that this component would be composed of small-bodied <br />minnow species, would not be effectively sampled by the mainchannel electrofishing technique <br />used by Anderson (1997), and would equal only 10% of the biomass estimate for backwaters. <br />This resulted in an additional prey fish biomass of 74 kg/mi. Combining the biomass estimates <br />for these three components of the prey fish community available to adult Colorado pikeminnow <br />resulted in a total prey fish biomass of 233 kg/mi in the Palisade to Ri..fJ.e reach. The biomass of <br />500 adult Colorado pikeminnow in this reach would equal about 11 percent of the available fish <br />prey base biomass in this reach. <br /> <br />For the Gunnison River, Burdick (1995) showed a similar number of fish collected in <br />backwaters-22,988 in 1992 and 23,918 in 1993 versus 22,659 in Anderson (1997). Backwater <br />area sampled by the two studies showed Burdick (1995) sampled 3,391-4,446 m2 in the Gunnison <br />River compared to 6,261 m2 by Anderson (1997) in the Colorado River. Because of these <br />similarities, it is assumed the pikeminnow/prey biomass ration would aIso be similar for the <br />Gunnison River. <br /> <br />For each river reach, achievement of the stocking objectives would result in a stocked <br />adult population of 575 adult fish aged 7-9, and approximately 1,700 fish distributed over 150 <br />river miles of three reaches in the Upper Colorado River subbasin. This includes the population <br />of 650 fish estimated for the currently occupied reaches of the Upper Colorado River in Colorado <br />and Utah. The population of adult fish distributed over three river reaches would represent one <br />presumptive genetic population in the Colorado and Gunnison rivers. <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.