Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Program that would aid in getting razorback larvae through the critical <br />early life period. However, it is recognized that a number of nonnative <br />fishes will also benefit from enhancement or restoration of floodplain <br />habitats. By employing an adaptive management approach through field <br />experimentation, the bottleneck of recruitment for razorback sucker may <br />be solved as concurrent control methods are implemented that are <br />dependent on the target nonnative fish species. <br /> <br />SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION <br /> <br />Seventeen (17) "problematic" nonnative fish species would likely benefit, <br />directly or indirectly, from enhancement or restoration of floodplain <br />habitats. Twenty-fiv~ other nonnative fishes do not pose a high threat of <br />predation or competition with the endangered fishes. Although various options <br />have been identified for resolving the problem, we believe that application of <br />an adaptive management approach should be used through carefully designed <br />field experiments that will evaluate methods to aid in the survival of <br />razorback sucker during the early life stages and, at the same time, partially <br />control nonnative fishes that may prey upon or compete with the razorback <br />sucker. The razorback sucker is a long-lived species with a rather high <br />fecundity that probably exhibited strong year classes when environmental <br />conditions were suitable. Recovery of this species may be possible if <br />successful recruitment can be achieved in 1 out of 10 years. <br /> <br />REFERENCES <br /> <br />Bayley, P.B. 1991. The flood pulse advantage and the restoration of river- <br />floodplain systems. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 6: 75-86. <br /> <br />Beyers, D.W., R.T. Muth, and M.S. Farmer. 1993. Competitive interactions between <br />larvae of Colorado squawfish and fathead minnow. Unpublished manuscript. <br />Larval Fish Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. 36 pp. <br /> <br />Burdick, B.D. 1995. Ichthyofaunal survey of the Gunnison River, 1992-1993. <br />Colorado River Fishery Project, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and <br />Wildlife Service, Grand Junction, Colorado. (Draft) <br /> <br />Crowl, T. 1994. Personal communication. Department of Fishery and Wildlife <br />Science, Utah State University, Logan. <br />e ~:'-:.:_,_ \,:-, "'::-.' ',",,:;':._ '_, '_':,-_'__,',,-:_::>-_":'~::,~-~-:'~:"'>?: '>~-::--; <br />DUlYsrriftor, ,1... 1993. Laboratory;"'~itudies of fath@acJ~JJ;..~lf"la_h~.Ui.l(fd <br />larvae. Natural Resources Department, The Klamath Tribes, Chiloquin, <br />Oregon. Research Report KT-93-01. 16 pp. <br /> <br />Grabowski, S.J. and S.D. Hiebert. 1989. Some aspects of tropic interactionsin <br />selected backwaters and the main channel of the Green River, Utah: 1987- <br />1988. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Research and Laboratory Services <br />Division, Environmental Sciences Section, Denver, Colorado. 130 pp. + an <br />appendix of 155 pp. <br /> <br />6 <br />