Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Some nonnative fishes are common to abundant in the Upper Basin with well <br />established populations. These fishes pose the greatest potential to benefit, <br />either directly or indirectly, from enhanced or restored floodplain habitats <br />and, therefore, have a high potential to adversely affect the razorback <br />sucker. These fish species must be considered carefully when enhancement or <br />restoration projects are being considered. They must also be monitored <br />carefully in sites that have been enhanced or restored to evaluate their <br />responses to the enhancement or restoration. Others are rare/incidental <br />throughout the Upper Basin, and may not cause problems for razorback suckers <br />except in specific localized areas (e.g., mosquitofish). The relative <br />abundance of 17 nonnative fishes in the Upper Basin is summarized as: <br /> <br />Common to Abundant <br /> <br />Locally Common/Abundant <br /> <br />Rare/Incidental <br /> <br />black bullhead <br />walleye <br />black crappie <br />mosquitofish <br />redside shiner <br />bluegill <br />plains topminnow <br /> <br />Many of the nonnative fishes do well in either riverine or lacustrine (lake- <br />like) environments (e.g., carp, red shiner, fathead minnow, smallmouth bass, <br />redside shiner, white sucker, plains killifish). Some will probably do better <br />in riverine habitats than in lake-like habitats (e.g., channel catfish, sand <br />shiner); and some will probably do better in lake-like habitats than in the <br />riverine habitats (e.g., northern pike, green sunfish, largemouth bass, black <br />bullhead, walleye, black crappie, mosquitofish, bluegill). Whether they <br />actively use floodplain habitats or not, many of the species will likely <br />benefit, directly or indirectly, from floodplain restoration to some degree. <br />Restored floodplain habitats are expected to provide allocthanous materials <br />and nutrients, and cause a temporary productivity pulse, both within and out <br />of channel (Bayley 1991). Some of the main channel species will likely <br />benefit from the increased productivity by an increase in growth or numbers. <br /> <br />channel catfish <br />red shiner <br />carp <br />fathead minnow <br />sand shiner <br /> <br />northern pike <br />green sunfish <br />largemouth bass <br />smallmouth bass <br />white sucker <br /> <br />Seventeen warmwater, nonnative fish species were identified as having the <br />potential to use enhanced or restored floodplain habitats and also having the <br />potential to adversely affect razorback suckers by predation or competition <br />(Table 2). The present distribution and relative abundance of these 17 fishes <br />are summarized on maps based on Tyus et al. (1982). These maps were updated <br />from various reports and personal communications (Appendix 1) that are listed <br />in the REFERENCE section. <br /> <br />Options to Prevent or Reduce "Problematic" Nonnative Fishes <br /> <br />The following options have been identified that would reduce or prevent <br />"problematic" nonnative fishes in enhanced or restored floodplain habitats. <br />Still other options exist beyond those identified in the following list. <br /> <br />3 <br />