Laserfiche WebLink
<br />22 <br /> <br />demonstrated the occurrence of Colorado squawfish larvae larger than 10 mm <br />TL throughout the lower 18 miles of the Yampa River over five years of <br />seine sampling in July and August, and documented a greater relative <br />abundance of squawfish larvae in 1983-84. Yet, none of the larger larvae <br />were collected in drift-net sampling. Furthermore; no Colorado squawfish <br />have been collected as fall yay or Age I juveniles in the lower Yampa. <br />It is hypothesized that Colorado squawfish larvae larger than 10 mm <br />utilize a more active or controlled downstream movement (versus passive <br />drifting). Perhaps even migration occurs. This is based on the premise <br />that Colorado squawfish reproductive strategy incorporates spawning in a <br />select river reach in Yampa Canyon and subsequent larval transport into <br />Green River nursery backwaters. <br />From another perspective, decreasing late-summer flow in the Yampa and <br />lack of zero-velocity habitat, including backwaters, may force these fish <br />to move downstream into the Green River. Concentrations of fall yay <br />observed in the Green River probably result from some combination of <br />drifting larvae deposited in the backwater habitats as well as post-larval <br />fish seeking this preferred habitat during active downstream movements. <br />As indicated in Archer and Tyus (1984) and Jones and Tyus (1985), the <br />magnitude of river discharge in the Green River in a given year determines <br />the amount of available zero-velocity habitat available~ and probably <br />determines the downstream distribution and survival of larval/post-larval <br />Colorado squawfish. <br />The narrow range of mean lengths~ ma:<imum-minimum length intervals, <br />and predominance of proto- and mesolarval Colorado squawfish in the drift <br />samples over the si;< week sampling period in 1985 suggests these fish <br />probably originated from the same locality. This lends further credence <br />to (but does not prove) the e:{istence of a primary spawning area upstream <br />versus generalized spawning throughout the lower Yampa. <br /> <br />piel periodic;j.\:L -- Results from 1983-84 8.nd 1985 indicate ::..ome <br />variability in diel periodicity in drifting Colorado squawfish larvae. <br />This is not interpreted to mean that a diel drift pattern does not e:<ist <br />for this species, but consideration of current knowledge of Colorado <br />squawfish spawning ecology in the Yampa - Green River system and the <br />drift-net sampling design suggest the latter has not been particularly <br />suited for documenting this pattern with regard to the environmental <br />variables known to influence larval drift. It has not been established <br />what the effect of temporal variability in turbidity has upon larval drift <br />in the Yampa River, or even what stimulus initiates the phenomenon. <br />Of concern here is the location of the spawning area versus the <br />sampling site. If the primary concentration of adult spawners actually <br />occurs around RM 16.5 - 18.2 on the Yampa River (Archer and Tyus 1984), <br />then the larval fish produced from this area represent the majority of <br />drifting Colorado squawfish in the lower Yampa. These fish are <br />subsequently sampled with drift nets at the Box Elder site at RM 2.0. In <br />essence, any diel periodicity displayed by the larvae as they drift out of <br />the spawning grounds may be variously diluted or disguised as fish <br />disperse downstream over the 14-16 river miles to Box Elder. The <br />estimated post--hatching age of larval Colorado squawfish suggests that the <br />river trip between the two sites may take 3-15 days. These factors may <br />account for the lack of a statistically significant diel drift pattern in <br />the 1983-84 results at Box Elder. Given the endangered status of this <br />