My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7194
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7194
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:52:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7194
Author
Nesler, T. P.
Title
Aquatic Nongame Research - 1985-86 Squawfish-Humpback Studies.
USFW Year
1986.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />10 <br /> <br />Flow data ~ecorded at the USGS Deerlodge Gage 09260050 indicate the <br />Yampa River flow decreased from 136 to 28 m3/s during the estimated <br />spawning period. Flows during the estimated June 25-29 peak spawning <br />period ranged from 108 to 136 m3/s. The relationship between Colorado <br />squawfish spawning activity estimated by YOY age-growth predictions and <br />observed flow regimes in the Yampa River is examined in mo~e detail in a <br />later section of this report. <br /> <br />P_c?:..:(.:.t:::I.!.f:L...~~~.2..(I![!..L;j,...!:l9.-.....Y_s,r.::.). .~~i.~_QJl <br />Volumes of water sampled by eacn of the three drift-nets were examined <br />for consistent or significant differences due to net placement or clogging <br />and resultant backwash. The three nets were always placed in a line <br />perpendicula~ to the river shoreline, and were probably subjected to <br />different flows and suspended debris conditions within the cross-section <br />of the stream surface sampled. Simple ~anking of the volumes sampled in <br />Table 4 was performed (according to a scale of~ i-largest volume, <br />2-mid-volume, and 3-smallest volume) for each time period shown Cie. <br />total, weekly, daily, individual}. Results of the rank totals indicated <br />that the middle net generally sampled the most water du~ing the season. <br />The main-channel-side net and nea~-shore-side net ~anked second and thii~d, <br />respectively, in water volumes sampled. Overall, the middle net sampled <br />4% more water than the main-channel-side net and 10% more water than the <br />near--shore-side net. The main-channel-side net sampled 6% more water than <br />the near-shore-side net. The weekly totals demonstrate that this general <br />ranking was not consistent far all 7 weeks during the sampling period, nor <br />was this general ranking consistent within the daily or individual sample <br />volume rankings. The trend is evident though from the mean sample volumes <br />for these sample groups. Examination of individual sample volumes for <br />each of the four daily time periods suggest the above trend was probably a <br />result of slower flow on the side of the near-shore net and greater <br />backwash potential on the side of the main-channel net due to progressive <br />clogging with st~eam drift debris. The individual sample volume data <br />indicates the main-channel-side net was significantly affected by backwash <br />four times, the middle net only twice, and the near-sho~e-side net only <br />once. <br />The water volume sampled data suggest that, even when placed in close <br />pro;{imity to each other, the three drift nets are sampling different river <br />conditions, and may not represent a triplicated sample: To test this, <br />mean volumes sampled for each net were compared for significant <br />differences using the Student's t distribution, pooled variances and <br />P=O.05. The available data for each net was split into two groups based <br />on sampling duration. Forty-eight, two-hour samples and 20, one-hour <br />samples were collected. Significant differences between mean volumes <br />sampled were noted in all comparisons between the three nets involving the <br />two-hour sample group. No significant differences were noted for the <br />one-hour sample group. <br /> <br />lLi,sJ.l__f;1 r t.fJ:_~a ria t. i c.Hl <br />Diel periodicity in drift densities we~e examined for the four major <br />species captul~ed: Colorado squawfish, channel catfish, bluehead sucker, <br />and flannelmouth sucker: It is apparent from Table 5 that Colorado <br />squawfish larvae occurred in greatest densities in the drift during the <br />dawn period. Most of the Colorado squawfish captured were mesolarvae, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.