Laserfiche WebLink
<br />= <br />....1 <br /> <br />PESULTS <br /> <br />9 e !.J.gr.:.::'?:.1 <br />Drift-net samples were collected from July 3 through August 16; 1985; <br />resulting in 204 total samples~ Nine fish species from four families were <br />collected (Table 11~ Bluehead sucker (CatostoffiuS discobolusl was the <br />dominant species collected, constituting 48% of the total catch and <br />oc:cur'l~ i ng in 40% of the '";amp}, (,~~,>" eh <3.nnc~1 c,J.t.f j. ~;h (1f;..L~:~J U.i.:J,.15.~. f2.I:L8j;.t~}t.u. ~2.) <br />Co lor .=':l.do ~:;qu.a~o.jf i sh (f.::j;.':.<s.:r!.9s;.t]g):.1~:~.;:;. .L!.,J.f;j..l:L;i.); .9.nd f 1 ,3.nn2 1 mou.t.h sue k'~I~ <br />(Catostomus latipinni~) ~~ere the next most abundant species, accounting <br />for 32; 10 and 7 percent of the total catch, and occurring in 42, 22; and <br />28 percent of the samples, respectively. Other species collected included <br />mu.ch smaller numbers of speckled dace (Phinirhthvs osculusl; Gila spp.; <br />san d ~5 h i n e ~- ( t~_g t I::-S:P.i.::2. "2..tr.::i~1l.L!:.l.f.:?'~,L5.), .f .3, the .9. d m inn 0 ~.! EJ..ill.~.P.t~.:.~.l..~~I~ p-r.:.f~tm e 1 E.~. 1 ; <br />an d mot t.1 ed sc u 1 pin (h.gtt!;;:~2 [:;!.:~!:...tr.:.9...U. <br />The six native species dominated the drift sample, constituting 68% of <br />the 4,589 fish collected, and occurring in 67% of the samples, Similarly, <br />native species collected in the drift samples in 1983 and 1984 accounted <br />for 65% of the 1,509 and 2;711 fish sampled in each year, respectively <br />(Haynes et al. 1985). Similar to past years, channel catfish was the <br />major non-native species collected in the drift with bluehead sucker <br />representing the major nat.ive species. <br /> <br />C qL!;;lJ::_;~l: d 0 _..1:LCllLs:.:t.::J.:Lt2.h <br />Larval Colorado squawfish were -first collected on July 9, six days <br />after sampling began (Table 2). Thereafter, they were present in the <br />drift samples each week through to termination of sampling on August 16. <br />Seventy percent of the larval squawfish ~~ere collected during July 9-12, <br />with a smaller peak representing 18% of the total sample collected on <br />August 6-8. The 455 larval Colorado squawfish collected during this study <br />represents the largest single collection of this species by drift-net <br />alone or in combination with seine samples for the Yampa River. The <br />overall drift density for larval Colorado squawfish in 1985 was 4.0 <br />individuals /lOOOm3. Drift densities in 1983 and 1984 were 1.2 and 0.9 <br />individuals /1000m3, respectively. Size of the larval squawfish <br />collected in 1985 ranged from 7.9 to 10mm, compared to 7.2 to 9.5mm for <br />1983-84 (Haynes et a1: 1985). Over the six weeks in which larval Colorado <br />squawfish were captured, mean lengths ranged from 8.5 to 9.0mm with <br />maximum-minimum length intervals per sample ranging only from 1,2-1.5mm <br />(T.a.ble 3). <br />Using the length data and the age-growth equations, larval squawfish <br />collected in 1985 were estimated to be 12-20 days old post-spawning (Table <br />2): The post-spawning age range for larval squawfish collected in 1983-84 <br />was 8-18 days. The estimated post-spawning ages for larval Colorado <br />squawfish in 1985 indicate spawning occurred at least from June 23 through <br />August 1 (Fig.2!. It is possible that more spawning and production of <br />larvae occurred later than August 1, since larval Colorado squawfish were <br />still being collected at termination of sampling on August 16. Peak <br />spawning was estimated to have occurred during June 25-29, accounting for <br />671. of the larvae collected. Two minor spawning peaks are also evident <br />during July 3-5 and July 23-26, accounting for another 7 and 15 percent, <br />respectively, of the larvae sampled. <br />