My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8114
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8114
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:52:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8114
Author
Nesler, T. P.
Title
Five-year Stocking Plan for Endangered Colorado River Fish Species in Colorado.
USFW Year
1998.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />would range from 0.8% of the fish community biomass in year 5 to 3.6% in year 8 to 2.3% <br />in year 10. Under fall only or spring only stocking scenarios using both fish sizes, the <br />maximum exceedance of the target adult fish/mile is 200% in year 7 or 8, respectively, and <br />biomass estimates reaching 2 % in those years. Under 6-inch size or lO-inch size stocking <br />scenarios in both seasons, maximum exceedance of the target adult fish/mile is 179 % in year <br />8 for both with the biomass estimate reaching 1.8%. <br /> <br />The message from these stocking scenarios for each species is that the potential to <br />exceed the target stocking objectives (overstock) is certainly possible with implementation of <br />any two or more combinations of fish size and season, if survival rates are similar for each <br />combination. It is also clear that monitoring survival and numbers of fish/mile is vital to <br />adjusting numbers of fish to be stocked and modifying the stocking design to the most <br />effective size and season combination. The estimates of the number of juvenile and adult <br />fish per mile during and subsequent to stocking are also useful monitoring indices to evaluate <br />survival and stocking needs. <br /> <br />Recommendations <br /> <br />1) Razorback sucker, bonytail and Colorado pikeminnow should be stocked into the <br />designated river reaches at the sizes, seasons, and numbers prescribed in Tables 1-3 <br />to meet the objective of a multi-age group adult population at the designated <br />population abundance level. <br /> <br />2) Monitoring of stocked fish should be initiated immediately after release, and <br />conducted at a frequency thereafter adequate to determine survival, distribution, <br />density, and causes for mortality (e.g. predation, starvation). <br /> <br />3) PIT tagging prior to stocking should be applied to Colorado pikeminnow, and batch <br />marking prior to stocking should be used for razorback sucker and bonytail. <br /> <br />4) Production of hatchery-raised fish and stocking numbers should be modified to <br />emphasize the most effective size/season combination and to achieve best survival and <br />post-stocking objectives based on monitoring results, and to minimize potential over- <br />stocking. <br /> <br />5) Stocking of a given size of fish in a given season in a given reach should be <br />discontinued if monitoring shows significant abandonment of the target reach via <br />downstream movement. Monitoring of this displaced cohort of stocked fish should be <br />continued to document distribution and survival. <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.