Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2) the Upper Colorado River reach and the Gunnison River reach are similar with <br />respect to this carrying capacity based on similar geohydrology and predominating <br />native fish communities based on observed native/nonnative species relative <br />abundance as described in Burdick (1995) and Anderson (1997). <br /> <br />3) Depletion and extirpation of adult populations above the barriers occurred as the <br />result of some combination of downstream spawning movements by adults over. the <br />barriers, and prevention of upstream dispersal movement and recruitment by late <br />juvenile or adult fish, or return migration by spawning adults. <br />4) As top predator, Colorado pikeminnow biomass as a percent of the system should be, <br />and would naturally be low (< 1 %). <br /> <br />5) the Colorado River reach from which biomass estimates in Anderson (1997) were <br />made was at carrying capacity. <br /> <br />Further, the following species interactions and recovery actions are anticipated: <br /> <br />1) Biomass and production of system occupied by common caIp, white sucker, and other <br />nonnative fish species may be reduced by control efforts, expanding production <br />potential within the native fish prey base for Colorado pikeminnow. <br /> <br />2) With successful establishment of this species, abundance of other native species may <br />be reduced as a result of predation. <br /> <br />A target biomass objective for Colorado pikeminnow of 1 % of the total fish community <br />biomass in each of the river reaches designated was arbitrarily selected. The numbers of <br />Colorado pikeminnow sucker required to equal this biomass was estimated to be 10 fish/mile <br />using average weight (2500 gm) and length (650 mm) estimates for adult fish. <br /> <br />Another consideration in selecting a target density and biomass of Colorado <br />pikeminnow is the biomass of available prey fish species. From Anderson (1997), a prey <br />fish biomass for the Palisade to Rifle reach of the Colorado River was estimated for the main <br />channel based on electrofishing results for fish < 300mm in length, and for the backwater <br />habitat based on July 1994 seine results. The average main channel biomass for prey fish <br />species was estimated at 119 kg/mi. Main channel prey species were dominated by <br />flannelmouth sucker, bluehead sucker, roundtail chub, and white sucker. For backwater <br />habitat in this reach, a prey fish population estimate was extrapolated from the number of <br />fish sampled, the backwater area sampled, and the estimated total backwater area based on <br />53 backwaters recorded and measured in the 52.6 mile reach. <br /> <br />The biomass of this population was estimated by partitioning based on the relative <br />abundance of each species, the fish size components for each species < or > 150 mm in <br />length, and calculating the weight of each size component using length-weight relationships <br />calculated in Anderson (1997) for each species. An average weight of 3 gm for a 64 mm <br /> <br />15 <br />