My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8167
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8167
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:52:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8167
Author
Nehring, R. B.
Title
Distribution and Abundance of the Fish Fauna in the Dolores River From McPhee Reservoir Downstream to the Dove Creek Pump Plant.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
Montrose, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />where W = weight and L = length. Condition factors can be calculated for <br />individual trout species for different stations and years (Lagler 1952). <br />Multiplying the weight by 100 standardizes the K value at 1. A "K" value of one <br />is average, less than one is below average, greater than one above average. K <br />factors provide additional information on changes in the body condition of the <br />trout in the Dolores River over the past 8 years. Average condition factors for <br />species and stations between years are presented in Table 13. <br /> <br />The body condition factor data indicates (with rare ex~eption) that the <br />average K factors for all three species of trout were higher at all three study <br />sites in 1987 and 1988 compared to 1989 through 1991. The only exception is the <br />Metaska site which registered a large increase in 1991. The K factor decreased <br />for all species at all sites in 1989 over 1988. This is an indication that food <br />and habitat conditions were becoming inadequate at that time for the trout <br />density and biomass in the river (see Tables 2 through 7). This was more than <br />6 months prior to the reduction in flow to 20 cfs in March 1990. <br /> <br />The K factors were either generally constant or increased slightly after <br />1989 through 1990 and 1991. However, this should not be construed as an <br />indication of an improvrnent in trout habitat conditions in 1990 and 1991. <br />Rather, it is the result of the very large decreases in trout density and biomass <br />after the 100 day period of 20 cfs from March 1 through mid-June 1990, i.e., an <br />easing of overcrowding in a degraded environment. The preceding statement is <br />validated by the fact that the 1991 K factors for the two downstream sites were <br />as low or lower than in 1987-1988, despite the fact trout density and biomass are <br />50%-80% or more below the levels of October 1988 (Tables 2-7). In reality, it <br />is not surprising K factors increased somewhat during 1990 and 1991 in light of <br />the dramatic decrease in density and biomass since October 1989. <br /> <br />Normal or above normal precipitation patterns returned to the Dolores River <br />drainage during the 1992 and 1993 water years. As a result, total discharge into <br />the Dolores River from McPhee Reservoir exceeded 100,000 AF during those years <br />for the first time since 1989 (see Tables 1 and 15). Body condition factors for <br />all three species (brown, rainbow, and cutthroat trout) at all three stations in <br />October 1992 were the best overall since sampling began in 1986. Moreover, K <br />factors at the Rock Stockpile Area (RM 10) in October 1992 were the best they. <br />have ever been for all three species of trout (Table 13). Again, these data are <br />another biological indication that the overall health of the river habitat and <br />biota has improved dramatically with increases in stream discharge and a return <br />to normal or above normal precipitation patterns in 1992 and 1993. <br /> <br />The K factor data for July 1993 (Table 14) is even more encouraging. The <br />only occurrence of a K factor ~ 1.0 was for rainbow trout at river mile 11, and <br />this was due to a sample size of 3 and a single rainbow with a K value of 0.66, <br />which dramatically lowered the average. Without this anomaly, all of the average <br />K factors for all three species at every river segment would have been;;:: 1.0, the <br />first such occurrence since sampling began in October 1986. (See .Table 15 in <br />Nehring 1992 and Table 13 in this report). This occurred in concert with the <br />increases in trout density and biomass in the fall of 1992 and summer of 1993. <br /> <br />Once again, these data strongly support the conclusion that the health of <br />the aquatic habitat and biota of the Dolores River below McPhee Reservoir has <br />significantly improved with the return of "normal" patterns of precipitation and <br />run-off. <br /> <br />Dolores River Flows and Water Temoeratures <br /> <br />Dolores River Flows - All of the foregoing information, including the <br />original reports (Nehring 1991, 1992), provide significant insights into the <br />linkage between the annual discharge patterns and volumes of water in the Dolores <br />River and the trout population from 1986 through July 1993. The question is "how <br />much water is necessary to maintain a quality trout fishery in this river" <br /> <br />...,..ll~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.