|
<br />Table 3.
<br />
<br />Chi-square goodness of fit analysis of northern pike length frequency distributions
<br />by river reach sampled for four size classes.
<br />
<br />OBSERVED FREQUENCIES
<br />
<br />".",',,''-,,~'''...,'','.,,'',,'',.,
<br />
<br />""'U ,-,>i, ~"" "..,..'.""" ...'.'. "",.."'.,, """",,', ","" "".,,<LilyPark
<br />
<br />Totallength
<br />'(mm)
<br />
<br />TOTAL
<br />
<br />~5oo 61 35 16 10
<br />501-600 94 18 31 21
<br />601-700 48 30 34 34
<br />L701 48 3 28 31
<br />TOTAL 251 86 109 96
<br />
<br />122
<br />164
<br />146
<br />110
<br />542
<br />
<br />EXPECTED FREQUENCIES
<br />
<br />,'.', """",' '>< ' .u '_ .,' ,',', ,", '.' . dl',. ." ,'"',,,,',,' ... ",,', ',,', "",',.."" ", '" ,I "" ,',' ". ,_." uul/ESTIMATED
<br />
<br />I>>>>,I./ii .",'.,'.,' ',",' ".,.,~' ".'.".', '.. ' """,' ". ", ""'" ',' "FR.EQa
<br />
<br />~5oo
<br />501-600
<br />601-700
<br />L701
<br />TOTAL
<br />
<br />""" ""
<br />
<br />',.,.,,' ","'.,u>u/
<br />
<br />~5oo
<br />501-600
<br />601-700
<br />L70l
<br />SUM
<br />
<br />56
<br />76
<br />68
<br />51
<br />251
<br />
<br />19
<br />26
<br />23
<br />17
<br />86
<br />
<br />25
<br />33
<br />29
<br />22
<br />109
<br />
<br />22 0.225
<br />29 0.303
<br />26 0.269
<br />19 0.203
<br /> ,,', """"" ..",./U
<br />96 """'"
<br />
<br />Craig "
<br />0.36
<br />4.29
<br />5.69
<br />0.17
<br />10.51
<br />
<br />CHI-SQUARE ESTIMATES
<br />"".Juniper .." ',' '.[( 'Ma,YbelV,"
<br />12.64 2.97
<br />2.47 0.12
<br />2.02 0.73
<br />11.97 1.56
<br />
<br />SUM
<br />22.20
<br />9.11
<br />11.00
<br />20.51
<br />62.83*
<br />
<br />"'Li}ypark>
<br />6.24
<br />2.23
<br />2.56
<br />6.81
<br />17.84
<br />
<br />29.10
<br />
<br />5.38
<br />
<br />Expected frequencIes per SIZe group :alculated trom SIZe group total/samp e total
<br />.Significant at P<O.OO5 for 9 df.
<br />
<br />23
<br />
|