Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />754 ac (4,352 ha). The Fish and Wildlife Service reports anticipated <br /> <br />serious repercussions with regard to the expanding deer herd of the <br /> <br />Carlyle area (Janzen. 1954). viz: <br /> <br />The bottom lands in the vicinity of Carlyle sustain IS to <br />2S deer. Food and cover are available for a substantially <br />larger herd. Assuming the decimating factors of poaching <br />and harassment by dogs will be curtailed as the possibili- <br />ty of a legal deer season becomes more certain, it seems <br />probable that the Carlyle deer herd would increase. <br /> <br />After the project was installed, the following conditions were projected: <br /> <br />Approximately 17,000 acres of potential big-game habitat <br />would be destroyed through inundation. This loss would re- <br />duce the potential annual deer value of the Carlyle area by <br />60 percent, and greatly reduce the chance of success in de- <br />veloping a permanent deer herd in the Kaskaskia Basin. <br /> <br />The Kaskaskia Basin was described in the pre-construction document as <br /> <br />"an area of 5.840 square miles." This concern again proved to be over- <br /> <br />ly pessimistic. In fact. the average annual deer harvest in the three- <br /> <br />county area contiguous to the project almost doubled after impoundment, <br /> <br />increasing from 130 deer per year in pre-impoundment years to 256 per <br /> <br />year following impoundment. This rate of increase paralleled a similar <br /> <br />incre <br /> <br /> <br />throughout southern Illinois during the same period. Pro- <br /> <br />ject pacts on deer resources were restricted to the immediate area of <br /> <br />the poject and appeared to be directly related to the amount of deer ha- <br />I . <br />bitat !directly lost due to impoundment and associated project development <br /> <br />(.Mart n. Prosser and Stroud, 1978). <br /> <br />Clark Hill Lake. The oldest and largest project among those evaluated. <br /> <br />Clark Hill permanently inundated 70.000 ac (28,329 ha) along the Savan- <br /> <br />nah ver in Georgia and South Carolina. This project was constructed <br /> <br />prior to the imposition of more restrictive land acquisition policies <br /> <br />46 <br />