Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />THE STATUS OF FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION: <br /> <br />AN OVERVIEW <br /> <br />by <br /> <br />Gera1 d C. Horak <br />,Enviro Control, Inc. <br />Fort Collins, CO 80524 <br /> <br />The achievement of successful measures for the protection of fish and <br />wildlife resources is a complex, multifaceted process. In its simplest <br />form, the process consists of three steps: formulation of a fish and wild- <br />life recommendation by state and federal fish and wildlife agencies, bargain <br />for an acceptable measure to both the fish and wildlife agencies and the <br />agency sponsoring a water resources development project; and implementation <br />and maintenance of the accepted measure by the agency operating the project. <br />Governmental decision makers have tended to accept ex ante analysis without <br />. -- <br /> <br />an adequate inspection of the "track record" of such analysis. Becauseof <br />constant pressure to give priority to ongoing and new projects, fish and <br />wildlife agency decision makers historically have not gathered the retro- <br />spective information so essential to ensuring that fish and wildlife measures <br />succeSSfully protect the resource. However, in the past six years federal <br />agencies have recognized this need and have funded research to provide decision <br />makers with feedback on the consequences on previous decisions. This paper <br />summarizes six research projects analyzing the formulation, acceptance, and <br />implementation of 578 fish and wildlife recommendations associated with 146 <br />water resource projects sponsored by seven federal agencies. On the basis of <br />these research findings, recommendations are offered to improve the effective- <br />ness of ff sh and wi 1 dl i fe measures. <br /> <br />1 <br />