Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> % of <br /> No. of % of Agreed-to <br /> Measures Meas ures Measures <br /> Recomnended Implemented Implemented <br /> TOTftL 432 67 88 <br />Habitat Improvement Measures 279 64 89 <br />Reservoir flood basins 35 74 90 <br />Reservoir conservation pools 26 81 100 <br />Dam discharge systems 15 67 100 <br />Streamflows, riffles and pools 90 64 97 <br />Streambank protection 6 83 100 <br />General practices 107 54 78 <br />Population Improvement Measures 153 72 87 <br />Fish propagation 33 76 86 <br />Fi sh passage 31 74 88 <br />Fish stocking and control 67 70 85 <br />Wildlife propagation and control 14 57 80 <br />Wildlife protection at canals 8 88 100 <br /> Table 4. Implementation Findings by C1 ass of Improvement Measure <br /> <br />In the category of reservoir conservation pools the two types of mea- <br />sures, maintenance of a minimum reservoir pool and control of reservoir <br />pool fl uctuation are associated with a 5i gni ficant deviation from the study <br />average. Minimum reservoir pool maintenance recommendations achieved unusual <br />implementation success. Once a minimum pool is incorporated into a project <br />operating plan, it Simply corresponds to the inactive conservation pool which <br />is rarely if ever evacuated and is therefore routinely maintained. Recom- <br />mendations for the control of reservoir pool fluctuations obtained strong <br />success at implementation. It is apparent that these recommendations once <br />accepted are associated with implementation success; perhaps only those <br />recommendations, which are consistent with the primary project purposes <br />are accepted. <br /> <br />15 <br />