Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> No. of % of % of % of <br /> Measures Measures Measures Measures <br /> Reconvnended Rejected Modi fi ed Accepted <br /> TOTAL 432 25 12 63 <br />Habi tat Improvement Measures 279 29 16 55 <br />Reservoir flood basins 35 17 11 72 <br />Reservoir conservation pools 26 19 8 73 <br />Dam discharge systems 15 33 13 54 <br />Streamfl ows, ri ffl es and pools 90 33 21 46 <br />Streambank protection 6 17 50 33 <br />General practices 107 31 13 56 <br />POpulation Improvement Measures 153 17 5 78 <br />Fish propagation 33 12 6 82 <br />Fish passage 31 16 13 71 <br />Fish stocking and control 67 18 1 81 <br />Wildlife propagation and control 14 29 7 64 <br />l~ild1ife protection at canals 8 12 0 88 <br /> Table 2. Bargaining Fi ndi ngs by Cl ass of Improvement Measure <br /> <br />The individual measures included in the lower acceptance rate concern <br />minimum flows, fluctuation control, maximum flows, current deflectors, check <br />dam, and artificial meanders. The first two measures accounted for 82 of the <br />90 requests and share similar characteristics. They constrain the maximization <br />of other project objects such as hydroelectric power or irrigation by either <br />requesting a minimum amount of water be continuously released through the dam <br />or by requesting 1 imi ts to daily fl uctuations in flow. <br />Within the category of fish propagation, fish hatcheries and nursery and <br />rearing ponds are responsible for the majority of recommendations which enjoy <br />a high rate of acceptance. Even though the cost involved in constructing and <br />maintaining them may be substantial, these measures were almost unanimously <br />accepted, because they greatly enhance the value of a stream fishery as well as <br />being extremely visible and pleasing to the public. <br /> <br />11 <br />