Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />63 <br /> <br />salmoides) should probably not be applied to Missouri populations CWege and Anderson <br /> <br /> <br />1978). Differences in condition factor between the two groups may have nothing to do <br /> <br /> <br />with condition but instead refle~t genetic differences that characterize the two stocks <br /> <br /> <br />(Miranda and Jackson 1990). Such considerations are necessary to standardize <br /> <br /> <br />applications of condition factors. The literature is replete in recent years with examples <br /> <br />of improper and or inappropriate use and interpretation of condition indices (Wege and <br />Anderson 1978; Cone 1989; Springer et al. 1990; Murphyet al. 1991). The strongest <br />criticisms are of its applicability across a broad range of populations, of the populations <br />used to develop it, and as to what it actually predicts (Murphy et al. 1991; Liao et al. <br />1995). <br /> <br /> <br />The primary objective of this study was thus to develop and evaluate a <br /> <br /> <br />standardized population condition factor (Kn) combined with a proximal analysis of lipid <br /> <br /> <br />content for larval razorback suckers, that could be used to examine spatial and temporal <br /> <br /> <br />patterns of condition in wild populations. Length-weight relationships and an associated <br /> <br /> <br />condition index, along with analysis of lipid-utilization patterns were derived for a series <br /> <br /> <br />of laboratory-raised populations under a variety of feeding regimes. Since a Kn = 1 <br /> <br />ideally represents an optimal individual larvae raised under controlled, Ad libitum <br /> <br /> <br />feeding and salubrious temperature conditions, determination of such a value should <br /> <br />allow evaluation of the specific effects of feeding and temperature. <br />