Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />f.....l.........'........ <br /> <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br /> <br />,- <br />t <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />~,. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />41 <br /> <br />used to test for homogeneity of slopes. Contrasts of least-squares means were used to <br /> <br />compare treatment effects where interaction terms were not significant. When the <br /> <br />interaction term was significant, least-square means cannot be used since the covariate <br /> <br />behaves differently between treatments. In such a case a multiple comparisons procedure <br /> <br />was used to compare means by date. Least squares regression and ANCOV A also were <br /> <br />used to examine relations among larval size, larval age, and otolith size. <br /> <br />m. Results <br /> <br /> <br />Both lapilli and sagittae are present at hatching. Asterisci did not appear until 14 <br /> <br /> <br />to 15 d after hatching at any feeding level and were markedly smaller in size at time of <br /> <br /> <br />appearance in low-feed and starved larvae. Diameters were not measured, but asterisci <br /> <br /> <br />were similar to lapilli in size about 2 weeks after appearing in Ad libitum larvae. Both <br /> <br /> <br />sagittae and lapilli were similar in size (30 to 40 .um; Figure 7a) at hatching. Lapilli <br /> <br /> <br />remained almost round and grew slowly while sagittae elongated and increased in size at <br /> <br /> <br />a faster rate, their length almost twice exceeding lapillus diameter 3 weeks after hatching <br /> <br /> <br />(Figure 7b). The rapid increase in size made sagittal otoliths the most desirable for <br /> <br /> <br />increment counting. Increments counts on sagittae and lapilli, however, were consistently <br /> <br />similar when lapilli were needed in a few cases where saggital otoliths were not clear. <br /> <br />Intercepts of least-squares regressions for number of increments against known <br /> <br />age were not significantly different from zero for any treatment. The first increment thus <br /> <br />forms the day of hatching (Table 3, Figures 8-10). Razorback sucker larvae do not begin <br />exogenous feeding until 5 to 7 d of age (Papoulias and Minckley 1990). Although not <br /> <br />'- <br />