Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />condition of larvae examined indicating effects are not uniform across the reservoir and <br /> <br />probably related to the variable effects of patchy resources and wind-generated currents. <br /> <br /> <br />Larvae from Yuma Cove, with the exception of a brief period of low condition, were <br /> <br />generally in as good or better condition than larvae raised on ad libitum rations in the <br /> <br /> <br />laboratory. Within Lake Mohave larvae persisted for up to 7 weeks following hatching, <br /> <br /> <br />though the average age was 15.3:t 7.3 days and 11.44:t 1.85 mm TL, smaller than <br /> <br /> <br />similar laboratory fish. All indices indicated although starvation is important, estimates <br /> <br /> <br />indicated between 23% and 78% larvae were starving depending on the year of collection <br /> <br /> <br />and the nutritional indice used, it alone cannot account for the apparently complete lack <br /> <br />of recruitment in this species. It is suggested that nutrition is instead acting in concert <br /> <br /> <br />with other limiting factors such as predation. Although larvae do starve, a greater <br /> <br /> <br />proportion exhibit reduced growth due to a less than optimal ration, keeping them within <br /> <br /> <br />the vulnerable size range for a greater length of time. Based on evidence of growth and <br /> <br /> <br />predation from other backwater studies, nutritional mortality at this time appears totally <br /> <br /> <br />compensatory. Regardless of whether larvae are starving or not they are all apparently <br /> <br />consumed by predators. If there were no predators there appears no reason why this <br /> <br />species should not persist. <br /> <br />IV <br />