Laserfiche WebLink
<br />10 <br /> <br />recovered when the 2 dead fish found subsequent to poisoning are <br /> <br /> <br />included). Thus, our estimates based upon 6 mark-recapture samples <br /> <br /> <br />predicted 93 to 111% of the actual total harvest of young fish, and <br /> <br /> <br />must be considered a highly accurate predictors of actual abundance <br /> <br /> <br />on 29 July. <br /> <br />It is notable that only 64% (34 of 53) of marked individuals were <br />recovered subsequent to 22 July (when marking was discontinued). <br />This result was attributed to mortality coincident with the period <br />of poor water quality (high temperature and low dissolved oxygen) <br />in June and especially early July (Figures 3-4). Fish captured <br />during that time were in poor condition (visibly emaciated, high <br />infestation of parasitic Lernaea), and mean growth was demonstrably <br />reduced (Table 1, Figure 1). Using our SChumacher-Eschmeyer <br />estimate of 329 (251-472) fish on 29 July as a baseline, and <br />assuming that subsequent survival was 64% (based upon recovery of <br />marked fish), we would predict a final harvest of about 211 fish <br />(140% of actual). This last estimate is well within the <br />extrapolated 95% confidence limit range based upon 64% survival <br />(i.e., 161 to 302 fish). MUltiple-census techniques applied here <br />provided reasonable results, and can be used reliably in the future <br />to assess razorback sucker abundance in rearing and grow-out <br />backwaters and coves at Lake Mohave. <br />