My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9675
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9675
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:48:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9675
Author
Hoffnagle, T. L. and e. al.
Title
Parasites of Native and Non-native Fishes of the Lower Little Colorado River, Arizona - 2000 Annual Report.
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Parasites of Native and Non-native Fishes of the Lower Little Colorado River, Arizona - 2000 Annual Report <br /> <br />Changing the behavior of intermediate hosts is a well-documented strategy by parasites <br />to increase their likelihood of being passed on to the next host (Beckage 1997). The catfish <br />tapeworms (c. fimbriatum and M giganteum) use small fish (possibly humpback chub) as an <br />intermediate host. Ornithodiplostomum sp. was found in 78% of the humpback chub examined. <br />This parasite uses fish-eating birds as its definitive host, but uses small fishes as intermediate <br />hosts. Additionally, Ornithodipostomum ptychocheilus (Radabaugh 1980) and other related <br />trematodes (Crowden and Broom 1980; Brassard et al. 1982; Lemly and Esch 1984; Lafferty and <br />Morris 1996) have been shown to alter host behavior in such a way as to increase the risk of <br />predation and, thus, the likelihood of continuing the life cycle of the parasite. Cestodes may also <br />be able to increase the likelihood of their intermediate host to be consumed by the next host by <br />decreasing growth (Pennycuick 1971) or increasing oxygen demand (Smith and Kramer 1987), <br />which expose the fish to an increased risk of predation (Milinski 1985). It may be that parasites <br />that use humpback chub as an intermediate host areas or more important to the survival of this <br />endangered species than the parasites that use them as definitive hosts. <br /> <br />Future Studies <br />Phase 1 of this study will continue with further field trips into the LCR scheduled for <br />Marchi April and June 2001. Evaluation of all sampled parameters (parasites, tissues, fish diet, <br />benthos, plankton, temperature, etc.) will follow the final field trip. Phase 2 has started <br />(preliminary work has already begun) and will focus on the impact of B. acheilognathi on the <br />growth rate of its host and acute pathogenicity in very young fish. We are concerned that field <br />data may be skewed as to impacts of this parasite on the very young fish (i.e., young fish that are <br />heavily infected may not survive long enough to be sampled). Experimental work will help us <br />fill this information gap. Parasite impact on growth is relevant because of the potential to <br />increase the window of vulnerability to predation for these fish. Additionally, vulnerability to <br />thermal stress is greater in smaller fish so infected fish that disperse into the mainstem Colorado <br />River may also suffer increased mortality. <br />At least two introduced parasites (B. acheilognathi and L. cyprinacea) infecting <br />humpback chub are restricted to the warmer LCR by the colder Colorado River (Carothers et al. <br />1981; Brouder and Hoffnagle 1997; qarkson et al. 1997; Hoffnagle and Cole 1999). T. truttae <br />is not restricted by cold temperatures, since it is found in rainbow trout in the Colorado River at <br /> <br />Hoffnagle et al. 2000 <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.