My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3010
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
3010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:28 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:47:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
3010
Author
Holden, P. B. and D. A. Selby.
Title
Study to Determine the Spawning Requirements of Colorado Squawfish.
USFW Year
1978.
USFW - Doc Type
Logan, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />The observation of constant motion is very noteworthy and has not been made <br />. previously for Colorado squawfish. Sacramento squawfish (Ptychocheilus grandis) <br />also exhibit constant motion (personal communication, Clair Stalnaker, FWS, Ft. <br />Collins). <br />. These observations by and large indicated that fish 40.670 behaved normally <br />in habitat selection, and that it probably was actively feeding. This would sug- <br />gest that perhaps the downstream movement was also normal, but further studies <br />. will be needed to verify this. <br />Three major problems were encountered during the course of the study which <br />caused the project to fail in fulfilling its objective. The first two, as men';' <br />. tioned earlier, were the initial delay in the start of the project and the late <br />arrival of the radio equipment. These delays forced an alteration of the sched- <br />uled phases in which the project was originally proposed and created a situation <br />. in which the radio equipment could not be adequately tested prior to actual im- <br />plantation of the radio tags. <br />The last problem and the most serious was the inability to track the fish. <br />. A number of potential causes of this situation may be hypothesized: <br />1. The fish may have died and either been swept so far downstream, or <br />covered with silt so deep, that the tag's signal could not be re- <br />. ceived. <br />2. The tags may have fallen out of the fish and been covered up or <br />swept into deep holes where the signal could not reach the surface. <br />. 3. The fish moved to tributaries or areas that were not searched, <br />such as the Colorado River. <br />4. The tagged fish moved into deep areas and stayed there during Phase <br />IV, thus their signals were too weak to be picked up by the SR-40 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />receiver. <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.