Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-8- <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />errors which may result with organisms that tend to clump together (EPA <br />1973). <br />The invertebrates were identified to genus, or the lowest practical <br />taxonomic level using a variety of taxonomic references (Merritt and <br />Cummins 1978; Edmunds 1976; Baumann 1977; Musser 1962; Edmondson 1959; <br />Wiggins 1977; Usinger 1956; Pennack 1953). <br />The results of the four benthic samples at each station were pooled <br />and, from this, the mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation <br />were computed. Species diversity for each station was determined, using <br />the Shannon Weaver species diversity index (EPA 1973). <br />Fishes <br />Fishes were collected using an electrofishing unit consisting of a <br />115 volt A.C. generator and a Coffelt Model II-C VVP, and seines (30' x <br />6' x ~" and 151 x 41 X 1/8"). Electrofishing runs were timed, and the <br />area seined was recorded. Fish were identified, enumerated, sufficient <br />numbers measured to provide length-frequency data and all but a few <br />reference specimens returned alive. Fish over 200 mm TL were tagged <br />with coded Floy spaghetti tags. Rare fish were tagged with small <br />modified Carlin dangler tags. Habitat type, substrate, and a sketch of <br />the area sampled were recorded for each seine collection. Shocking runs <br />usua lly covered a vari ety of habitats and substrates, so phys i ca 1 data <br />recorded for these samples were more generalized. <br />When rare fish [Colorado squawfish, humpback chub, bony tail chub <br />(Gil a e 1 egans), and humpback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus)] were captured, <br />