My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9449
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9449
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:46:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9449
Author
Hawkins, J. A.
Title
Recapture and growth rates of three Colorado River endangered fish species
USFW Year
2003.
USFW - Doc Type
a comparison between electrofishing and non-electrofishing.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />Colorado pikeminnow, Ptychocheilus lucius, humpback chub, Gila cypha, and <br />razorback sucker, Xyrauchen texanus, are endangered fishes that reside in the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin and are often captured by electrofishing for research or <br />management purposes. Because of increased evidence of electrofishing injuries in fish <br />and concerns about potential negative effects on populations there have been <br />recommendations to curtail its use on endangered fishes. The objective of this study <br />was to determine if the effects of electrofishing on these three species were similar to <br />the effects of other sampling gears. Two hypotheses tested whether 1) recapture rates <br />or 2) growth rates were similar for electrofishing and non-electrofishing gear types. <br />A database of endangered fish captures and recaptures between 1975 and 2000 <br />was compiled and used for all analyses. Recapture rate was calculated for fish that <br />were recaptured at least once. For all three species, recapture rates of fish initially <br />captured by electrofishing were similar to recapture rates of fish initially captured by <br />non-electrofishing gears. Differences in recapture rate, based on gear type, ranged <br />from 1.2% to 2.7% and except for Colorado pikeminnow the rates were not statistically <br />different. Although recapture rates for Colorado pikeminnow were statistically different <br />(P=0.04), the difference in rates was small (2.4%) and determined not biologically <br />meaningful. Mean monthly growth rate was calculated for fish for the first and second <br />growing season between initial capture and first recapture. Growth rates for each of the <br />three species were similar for fish initially captured by electrofishing or <br />non-electrofishing gears and not statistically different. These results indicate that <br />vi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.