My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9385
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9385
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:46:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9385
Author
Hawkins, J.
Title
Responses by Flaming Gorge Technical Integration Team to April 4, 2000, Minority Report from John Hawkins
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
Flow and Temperature Recommendations for Endangered Fishes in the Green River Downstream of Flaming Gorge Dam (hereafter the Flow Report.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Average annual peak flow in Savery Creek will be delayed by 3 days on average <br />and 25 days maximum and reduced by 165 cfs (4.7 m3/s). Water diverted for <br />irrigation will be lost because of evapotranspiration. This will result in a maximum <br />reduction in average monthly discharge of 10% in April and a maximum increase <br />of 23% in October in the Little Snake River at the "near Lily" gage. Average <br />annual depletion in the Little Snake River will be 10,836 af. Salts in the Little <br />Snake River are predicted to increase about 25% during base flow (Burns and <br />McDonnell 1999). <br /> <br />Sediment Yield <br />The Little Snake River sediment load constitutes approximately 77% of the <br />Yampa River sediment load in Deerlodge Park (O'Brien 1987). Roughly 60% of the <br />total sediment load in the Yampa River is derived from the Little Snake River <br />between Dixon and Lily (Andrews 1978). Andrews (1978) arrived at this <br />conclusion by examining the difference in the computed average annual sediment <br />loads based on the available data at the Dixon and Lily gages. This portion of the <br />basin is underlain by relatively young, high erosion sedimentary formations. Very <br />little information is available to quantify the sediment yield of the various <br />tributaries of the Little Snake River basin. The four major tributaries draining this <br />area were ranked by RCI (1991) in terms of sediment contribution as follows: 1) <br />Sand Wash, 2) Muddy Creek, 3) Sand Creek, and 4) Powder Wash. Sand Wash <br />and Muddy Creek were given relatively equal rankings. As was previously <br />discussed, the poorly cemented sandstones, siltstones and mudstones combined <br />with the effective rainfall and sparse vegetation generate a high sediment yield <br />from these tributary basins. <br /> <br />Most of the available data base for determining sediment yield in the Little <br />Snake River basin was collected at the Lily Gage between 1959 and 1964 when <br />suspended load measurements were made on a daily basis (Table 1). This core <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.