My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9385
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9385
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:35 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:46:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9385
Author
Hawkins, J.
Title
Responses by Flaming Gorge Technical Integration Team to April 4, 2000, Minority Report from John Hawkins
USFW Year
2000.
USFW - Doc Type
Flow and Temperature Recommendations for Endangered Fishes in the Green River Downstream of Flaming Gorge Dam (hereafter the Flow Report.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />that humpback chub might be attempting to spawn in the Little Snake River. <br />Humpback chub were captured and telemetered in the Little Snake River between <br />May and July during their spawning period. Two humpback chub were captured <br />with secondary sexual characteristics such as spawning coloration and breeding <br />tubercles. Water temperatures in the Little Snake River were adequate for <br />spawning when humpback chub were present. Long-range movements of 32 and <br />39 km by two telemetered humpback chub in the Little Snake River were similar to <br />distances moved by spawning humpback chub in the Grand Canyon. Despite <br />considerable fidelity to local population centers, humpback chub are known to <br />move relatively long distances between populations groups or for spawning. <br />Although there is circumstantial evidence that support potential spawning of <br />humpback chub in the Little Snake River, currently there is no proof. No <br />humpback chub have been collected in ripe, spawning condition in the Little Snake <br />River and all juveniles collected there have been identified as congeneric roundtail <br />chub. In addition, confirmation through larval collections was not possible <br />because there were not adequate morphometric characteristics to distinguish small <br />larvae of Gila species. Differentiation of small Gila species larvae may require <br />genetic evaluation. <br /> <br />Our recommendations for the Instream Flow Work Plan focus on research <br />necessary to develop scientifically defensible flow recommendations. We <br />recommend: <br /> <br />1. Develop interim flow recommendations based on present knowledge. <br />2. Estimate Little Snake River flows and sediment loads necessary for creation <br />and maintenance of Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker nursery <br />habitats in the Green River. <br /> <br />viii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.