Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. In Lily Park, removal was effective at reducing numbers of large northern pike <br />~ 600 mm. <br />. Removal was initially effective in all reaches, but was least effective in Maybell <br />and Juniper reaches, apparently due to the proximity of each reach to a source <br />of recruiting and immigrating fish. <br />. In Juniper and Maybell, the number of large northern pike ~ 600 mm was <br />apparently sustained in 2002 by recruitment of a strong cohort to that length. <br />. Northern pike densities were highest in concentration areas and northern pike <br />recolonized these areas after removal. <br />. Northern pike outnumbered Colorado pikeminnow in the river and in several <br />backwaters. <br />. Changes in length-frequency distributions of northern pike over time were <br />attributed to growth of strong cohorts and not a result of removal. <br />. There were strong cohorts of juvenile and small adult northern pike that <br />apparently entered critical habitat through Juniper, the most upstream reach in <br />critical habitat. <br />. Northern pike consumed prey that were up to 72% of their body length. <br />. Colorado pikeminnow were subject to northern pike predation attempts as <br />evidenced by attack injuries. <br />. Northern pike attack injuries were observed on 18% of Colorado pikeminnow and <br />annual injury rate increased over time. <br />. Northern pike preyed on other native fishes such as roundtail chub, flannelmouth <br />sucker, and blue head sucker. <br /> <br />viii <br />