My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7025
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:45:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7025
Author
Hawkins, J. A. and T. P. Nesler.
Title
Nonnative Fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
An Issue Paper.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />Guidance for the study and management of impacts of nonnative fishes on Colorado <br />River endangered fishes was addressed through development of this issue paper. A review <br />of published literature and government reports relating to interactions between native and <br />nonnative fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin (upper basin) resulted in a reference <br />list of 133 papers. A questionnaire was also developed to establish expert opinion and <br />consensus on various aspects of this issue. Research and management recommendations, <br />and a strategy for implementation of related recovery efforts are also provided. <br /> <br />Increases in the number and relative abundance of nonnative fish species in the upper <br />basin have been documented and shown to be related to habitat alteration and river flows. <br />Predation on endangered fishes in the upper basin has been documented mostly for channel <br />catfish. Nonnative fish predation was identified most frequently in artificial settings where <br />native fish were reared in large numbers, in confined areas, or after stocking of hatchery- <br />reared fish. Studies on diets of native and nonnative fishes have shown dietary overlap <br />between larval or early juvenile Colorado squawfish and juvenile channel catfish, larval to <br />adult red shiner, and juvenile to adult green sunfish, but information on availability of forage <br />items was lacking and conclusive statements about competition could not be made. Spatial <br />competition is also suggested based on habitat-use overlap between young Colorado <br />squawfish, red shiner, sand shiner, and fathead minnow, and between adult Colorado <br />squawfish, channel catfish, northern pike, and walleye. However, in each study, habitat <br />availability was not documented. Introduction of disease to native fishes from introduced <br />fishes was not considered a problem; although, Asiatic tapeworm has recently been found <br />in hatchery-reared Colorado squawfish that were stocked into riverside ponds. Habitat <br />alteration by introduced fishes and hybridization between nonnative and any of the four <br />endangered native fishes have not been documented. <br /> <br />Expert opinion suggested that introduced fishes affecting native fishes are a problem <br />in most Colorado River Basin drainages. Six introduced species of greatest or widespread <br />concern were channel catfish, red shiner, northern pike, common carp, green sunfish, and <br />fathead minnow. Most of these species were considered widespread in distribution, and their <br />impacts on native fishes were considered constant or inversely affected by flow regime. <br />Expert opinion often identified that Colorado squawfish and razorback sucker, their young, <br />and all native fish larvae, were negatively affected by predation or competition from <br />nonnative fishes. Documented evidence ofthese interactions was limited. Research directed <br />at evaluating predation and competition between the above nonnative fishes and endangered <br />and other native fishes is needed to answer specific recovery questions. Sport-fishery value <br />of introduced fishes was recognized largely for reservoir fisheries, tailwater fisheries, and the <br />Yampa River northern pike fishery. Channel catfish was considered to be supporting the <br />most widespread riverine fishery, but the fishery was of moderate or greater importance only <br />in select localities. Riverine fisheries for all other introdl:lced game fish were generally <br />considered to be small or inconsequential Mortality of endangered fishes from incidental <br />take by angling was not considered a significant problem by a majority of respondents. <br /> <br />VII <br /> <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.