My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7025
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:45:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7025
Author
Hawkins, J. A. and T. P. Nesler.
Title
Nonnative Fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
An Issue Paper.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />29 <br /> <br />the Rio Grande basin due to widespread distribution and abundance. Sheepshead minnow <br />and plains minnow were identified as specific problems in the Pecos River basin (New <br />Mexico-Texas ). <br /> <br />Several respondents indicated they were not sure, that introduced fish have not been <br />determined to be problematic, or that they could not pinpoint any problematic species at <br />present One respondent considered this question to be too broad; another considered it <br />to be conjecture. One respondent indicated he did not have time to answer this question. <br /> <br />Question 7: Do any of the introduced fish species support sport fisheries, and are these <br />fisheries large, moderate, inconsequential? <br /> <br />Wildlife agencies are increasingly faced with potentially conflicting demands of <br />providing sport fisheries as well as maintaining native fish populations in their natural <br />habitat The intent of this question was to point out what appears to be at stake for wildlife <br />agencies on the sport fishery side of the issue as they pursue the recovery of endangered <br />native fishes. If a gamefish species is determined to present an unacceptable threat to the <br />recovery of endangered fish species, polarity of the management issue will intensify with the <br />popularity of the gamefish and size of associated fishery. Conversely, attempts to negatively <br />manage carp and small cyprinids to benefit native fishes will be met with indifference or <br />applause by the public since they have no sport fishery value. Only three respondents <br />indicated introduced species supported no sport fisheries in the Colorado River Basin. <br />Presumably these persons were referring to riverine fisheries exclusively. <br /> <br />Channel catfish <br /> <br />Several respondents considered this species to provide moderate level fisheries overall <br />in the Colorado River Basin. One respondent considered channel catfish to be probably the <br />most popular riverine gamefish present, but another considered their populations were <br />generally unexploited overall. In Utah, channel catfish fisheries in the Green and Colorado <br />rivers were considered moderate. One respondent considered catfish fisheries in Utah to <br />be inconsequential from an economic perspective while another considered this species to <br />provide substantial opportunity locally in Utah near towns like Vernal and Moab. In <br />Colorado, channel catfish fisheries were considered moderate to large in the Colorado, <br />Gunnison, White, Yampa, Dolores, and Little Snake rivers. Differences in assessment were <br />noted between respondents for all these rivers in Colorado. The Little Snake River catfish <br />fishery was deemed inconsequential by one respondent. In New Mexico, fisheries for this <br />species were considered large overall, but small in the San Juan River due to low public <br />access. <br /> <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.