My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7025
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:45:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7025
Author
Hawkins, J. A. and T. P. Nesler.
Title
Nonnative Fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin
USFW Year
1991.
USFW - Doc Type
An Issue Paper.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />27 <br /> <br />Disease <br /> <br />Fathead minnow was specifically identified as a possible disease source for native <br />fishes by one respondent. Another identified Asiatic tapeworm as a disease problem. <br /> <br />Habitat Alteration <br /> <br />The common carp was listed by two respondents as having an impact upon native <br />fishes through habitat alteration. <br /> <br />Question 5: Are you aware of any documented evidence, published or not, in the Colorado <br />River Basin demonstrating: <br /> <br />-predation upon endangered fishes, in genera~ selectively, or as a threat to population survival? <br /> <br />-a competitive advantage of an introduced fish species over an <br />endangered or other native fish species? <br /> <br />-a beneficial effect of an introduced species upon the native fish fauna? <br /> <br />If the answer is yes to any of the above, please summarize below and cite the appropriate <br />literature reference, or, if possible, please provide us with copies of unpublished reports. <br />If the evidence exists as unpublished raw data, please specify as such. <br /> <br />Sixty-two percent of the 26 respondents answered yes to the predation segment of the <br />question. Apart from the eight references cited by numerous respondents, references were <br />also made in two instances to unpublished file data in Utah DWR and at Arizona State <br />University. Personal communication was cited several times regarding predation upon <br />razorback sucker larvae or humpback chub. One respondent was confused by what defined <br />"documented evidence" and two indicated they did not have time to adequately answer this <br />question. Northern pike were listed as a possible "undocumented" threat to T&E species <br />in the Green, White, and possibly Duchesne rivers. Smallmouth bass, flathead catfish and <br />channel catfish were listed as predation problems for all native fish species in the Gila River <br />basin. Two respondents indicated predation problems occurring primarily in impoundments. <br />One respondent indicated predation by Colorado squawfish on channel catfish was a threat. <br /> <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br /> <br />Fifty percent of 20 respondents answered yes to the competition segment of the <br />question, though few sources of evidence were cited One respondent indicated northern <br />pike were dominating clear backwater habitat in the upper Yampa. Several respondents <br />referred to the competitive impact of red shiner upon spikedace and loach minnow <br />documented in draft'recovery plans for the two species in the lower Colorado River Basin. <br />One respondent cited the increased catch/unit effort index for nonnative species relative to, <br />native species as circumstantial evidence. One respondent felt red shiner undoubtedly had <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.