9444 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

evaluation of growth affects was limited by the small number of recaptured fish. Immediate mortality was not observed in any fish captured but it is likely that the one fish that experienced respiratory arrest was injured severely enough to cause mortality if it had not been resuscitated. Physiological response of fish to the electrical field did not follow established theory that fish become increasingly incapacitated as they move closer to the anode. Proximity is considered important because there is evidence that the closer a fish is to an electrode, the greater its potential for injury (Snyder 1992). Fish in this study were captured at a range of distances from the anodes and their physiological state was not related to the distance; but, the relationship was potentially confounded by the inability to accurately observe fish location at all times prior to capture. Observations of fish location in this study may not accurately portray how close some fish were to an electrode before capture because their trajectory and location prior to netting was often obscured by turbidity and influenced by the moving boat, flowing water, and fish depth. This might explain why some tetanized fish were captured more than 2 m from an anode. However, this explanation does not account for fish observed swimming all the way to and touching an anode without experiencing tetany. Because the area immediately adjacent to the anode has the highest voltage gradient, fish that are extremely close or touch the anode should experience tetany (Snyder 1995). Fish that touched an anode in this study (whether tetanized or not) were not injured at a greater rate than fish that did not touch an anode. However, the harmful effects of extreme tetany were observed in the fish that was in respiratory arrest after prolonged contact with a live anode. Without resuscitation this fish would have 15