Laserfiche WebLink
<br />61 <br /> <br />The number of tagged fish will increase dramatically with increased sampling efficiency <br />and with tagging extended to smaller fish. If stocked fish are marked, thousands of tag records <br />may be added. This increase will strain the record keeping system unless we adopt new database <br />technology. The new technology associated with PIT tag data retrieval may simplify some aspects <br />of data management, but it will also require new and better methods for data storage. It is <br />important that we identify objectives and methods of future tagging studies, including data. <br />collection and cataloging. Any new tagging program should commit to the maintenance of this <br />information. <br /> <br />The data collection process should be reviewed to ensure the data is useful and has the <br />necessary resolution. Consistency between research groups should be encouraged. Because <br />species involved tend to be wide ranging, we need to shift from a localized to a basin-wide view. <br />Tagged fish records should be consolidated into one database on an annual basis. Providing <br />researchers with an annual list of tagged fish will eliminate the current difficulty in locating <br />previous capture records. A summary of capture information will encourage researchers to view <br />their capture records within the context of other captures in the Upper Basin. Researchers <br />should still interpret their own results, but an annual summary of tagged fish records will <br />facilitate and enhance their interpretations. <br /> <br />As Carlin-tagged fish die or lose their tags, the influx of new data will decrease; however, <br />the usefulness of this information will remain. We need to continue with the efforts reported <br />herein and compile a master tagging database of all fish tagged to date. This information will <br />serve as a baseline for current and future studies with the Upper Basin. <br /> <br />ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS <br /> <br />I thank all researchers who provided data: T. Chart (Utah Department of Natural <br />Resources, UDNR), S. Cranney (UDNR), L. Crist (Bio/West, Inc., BW), P. Holden (BW), K. Karp <br />(USFWS), P. Martinez (Colorado Division of Wildlife, CDOW), C. McAda (USFWS), T. Nesler <br />(CDOW), D. Osmundson (USFWS), K. Paulin (USFWS), S. Platania (University of New Mexico), <br />D. Propst (New Mexico Department of Game and Fish), H. Tyus (USFWS), R. Valdez (BW), and <br />E. Wick (Colorado State University, CSU). B. Muth (CSU) D. Snyder (CSU) and E. Wick also <br />provided helpful suggestions for earlier drafts of this manuscript. <br />