Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2 <br /> <br />Musker (1981) aged 152 Colorado squawfish collected from the Colorado (14), Green <br />(103), Yampa (26), and White (nine) rivers between 1979 and 1981. Using the scale method, he <br />back-calculated lengths. He determined a body-length to scale-radius relationship for each river <br />and used the result in the back-calculation formula. Due to small sample sizes and the lack of <br />smaller fish, these relationships were not accurate and influenced his results. Musker (1981) <br />reported lengths of age 1+ fish at 195 mm for the Yampa River and 399 mm for the White River. <br />However, the first annulus was unknowingly missed and fish 'Were underaged by one year. <br />Fin-ray sections were used to corroborate scale ages from two fish. <br /> <br />The age information provided by these studies has been valuable and is often cited by <br />other researchers. With our increasing understanding of the life history of Colorado squawfish, <br />certain aspects of their age and growth become apparent. There was a need to synthesize the <br />information we have to date with current age and growth data and relate the known life-history <br />events of the species with age and growth. Information presented in this report will be expanded <br />in my master's thesis that will be completed by late fall 1991. <br /> <br />Ob iectives <br /> <br />The objectives of this study were to: <br />I) Evaluate use of scales as a standard ageing method for Colorado squawfish. <br />2) Validate the scale technique by use of other bony structures and <br />mark-recapture information. <br />3) Determine average individual growth rates and compare between <br />populations. <br />4) Determine age composition of each population. <br />5) Compare rates of growth, size at maturity, and longevity in male and <br />female Colorado squawfish. . <br /> <br />Hypotheses were: <br />1) Colorado squawfish individuals can be aged using standard scale-ageing <br />techniques. <br />2) Ageing Colorado squawfish with scales is equivalent to ageing with <br />otoliths, vertebrae, fin rays, or opercula. <br />3) Growth rates are equal between individuals in different populations. <br />4) Growth rates of males and females are equal. <br />5) Current growth rates are equal to historical rates of growth. <br /> <br />Two objectives (2 and 5) were not met because of complications. Other bony structures <br />(otoliths, vertebrae, and opercula) were not used to validate the scale technique. An attempt was <br />made to age these structures, but my present expertise was not sufficient to place much <br />confidence in the results. Other validation methods, discussed later, were used to validate scale <br />ages. Work will continue with other bony structures, but ages obtained will also need verification <br />to ensure that ages are correct. Results of this work will be presented in my thesis. Because only <br />a limited number of aged fish were positively identified as either male or female, no attempt was <br />made to compare results between sexes. <br /> <br />METHODS <br /> <br />Canture and ta~ records <br /> <br />Records of Colorado squawfish tagged from 1978 through 1989 were obtained from the <br />database administrator of the USFWS Grand Junction, Colorado, field station. Additional records <br />were obtained from agency progress reports and personal com~unication with researchers. <br />Agencies involved in these collections included Bio/West, Inc.; Colorado Division of Wildlife; <br />Colorado State University; New Mexico Department of Fish and Game; New Mexico State <br />University; Utah Department of Natural Resources; and USFWS field stations in Grand Junction <br />