Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />the Yampa River in May and June to the point that Little Snake River minimum <br />temperatures often exceeded maximum temperatures on the Yampa River. In later <br />months during baseflow, average daily temperatures were similar between both <br />rivers but the Little Snake River had diel fluctuations as high as 200C between its <br />daily high and low temperatures. <br /> <br />Our most significant finding was the scarcity of nonnative fishes. Of 4,490 <br />fish collected, 69% were native species. Five native and seven nonnative species <br />were collected. Native species included roundtail chub, speckled dace, bluehead <br />sucker, flannel mouth sucker, and mottled sculpin. Nonnative species included red <br />shiner, common carp, fathead minnow, redside shiner, sand shiner, white sucker, <br />and channel catfish. No endangered fishes were seen or collected. Species in <br />highest abundance were native bluehead sucker (31 %), flannelmouth sucker <br />(23%), and nonnative redside shiner (20%). Other numerically abundant species <br />included speckled dace and sand shiner. Few common carp, white sucker, channel <br />catfish, fathead minnow, or red shiner were collected. Larvae were collected for <br />all species except common carp and channel catfish. Few roundtail chub larvae <br />were collected even though juveniles and adults were fairly common. <br /> <br />All five native species spawned within the Little Snake River. Spawning was <br />also confirmed for five of the seven nonnative species. Channel catfish and <br />common carp larvae were not collected and their spawning was not confirmed. <br />The small number of nonnative fish larvae collected implied limited spawning by <br />most nonnative fishes in the Little Snake River. <br /> <br />After July, discharge in the Little Snake River decreased so low that many <br />reaches were essentially devoid of fish due to insufficient water levels. During this <br />low-flow period, fish of all sizes tended to congregate in refugia pools located in <br />the Upper and Lower reaches. During July base-flows, the removal sampling <br />method was effective for sampling refugia pools. The technique provided a good <br /> <br />v <br />