My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8006
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:44:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8006
Author
Hawkins, J. A., E. J. Wick and D. E. Jennings.
Title
Icthyofauna of the Little Snake River, Colorado, 1994 - Final Report.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />As discharge declined in the Little Snake River, diel water temperature <br />variability increased. On July 13, when discharge dropped below 0.03 m3/sec on <br />the Little Snake River, the difference between the daily high and low temperatures <br />was almost 20oC. On the same date, Yampa River discharge was 4.5 m3/sec and <br />diel water temperature variation was only 40C (Appendix Figure B.3). Hourly water <br />temperatures cycled daily from a low just before sunrise to a high a few hours <br />before sunset. <br /> <br />Fish Community <br /> <br />Each site and discharge level presented different obstacles to effective <br />sampling and required different sampling gear, especially during the extremely low <br />baseflow. For example, a shallow rapid located downstream of the boat launch <br />made the lower site accessible only by raft even during runoff. The site was <br />accessible only by foot during baseflow because discharge was too low for any <br />type of boat. We sampled the site at both flow levels with trammel net, seine, <br />cast net, and angling. The middle site was too shallow for a boat at all flow levels, <br />and the monotonous habitat contained no suitable sites for large-fish sampling gear <br />so we sampled it only by seine at all flow levels. The upper site was the only site <br />sampled by electrofishing boat and seine during runoff; at low flow, it was <br />sampled by bank electrofisher and seine. Because such different effort and gear <br />were used at each site we did not compare fish captures between sites or seasons. <br />Catch per effort was not calculated because different gear were used at each site <br />and season and because catch varied greatly depending on the habitat and <br />sampling efficiency. Attempts to standardize catch rates by effort would therefore <br />be misleading so we combined all sites, sample gear, and sample trips and reported <br />the total number of each species by life stage. <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.