My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8006
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:32 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:44:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8006
Author
Hawkins, J. A., E. J. Wick and D. E. Jennings.
Title
Icthyofauna of the Little Snake River, Colorado, 1994 - Final Report.
USFW Year
1997.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver, CO.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />sexual characteristics such as spawning coloration or breeding tubercles. <br />Spawning was confirmed and time of spawning was estimated based on when <br />larvae were collected. <br /> <br />Population Estimate for the Upper Site <br /> <br />As part of standard sampling of the upper site during base-flow, large-bodied <br />fish were collected at one site using a four-pass, removal, sampling design. This <br />was done to obtain abundance estimates for each species and to test if removal <br />sampling in a river of this size was practical at base flow. <br /> <br />The sample site was a pool, 130-m long that averaged 23-m wide (width <br />ranged 9-26 m) and was similar to other baseflow refugia pools in the upper reach. <br />Within the thalweg, which was about 5-m wide, average depth was 0.8 m and <br />maximum depth was 1.2 m. Outside the thalweg, along the margins of the pool, <br />depths were < 0.5 m due to sand deposition. Substrate in the reach was <br />predominately gravel, but the pool also contained sand and boulders. To meet the <br />assumption of closure required by the population estimator, fish were confined in <br />the reach with nets (White et al. 1 982). An upstream riffle was blocked by a <br />10-mm mesh net and a shallow, downstream, low-velocity run was blocked with a <br />trammel net partially covered by a 10-mm mesh net. <br /> <br />Fish were collected for the population estimate by bank electrofishing. A <br />5000-watt generator provided electricity to a Coffelt@ VVP-1 5 set to 300 volts, <br />2.5-4 amps, 30 pulses/second, and 40% pulse width. Three netters stood 1-m <br />abreast and electrofished in an upstream direction. Fish were collected and held in <br />a live-car during each pass. Fish removed from the trammel net were counted and <br />included with fish caught by electrofishing on each pass. All fish were released <br />alive after the fourth and final pass. Population size of each species within the <br />pool was estimated with the computer program CAPTURE (White et al. 1982). <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.