My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9350
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9350
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:34 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:43:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9350
Author
Hawkins, J., T. Modde and J. Bundy.
Title
Ichthyogauna of the Little Snake River, Colorado, 1995 with Notes on Movements of Humpback Chub.
USFW Year
2001.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />20 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />sucker, and common carp each composed only a small portion (< 3%) of the fish <br />collected. Most small-bodied species were nonnatives in both 1994 and 1995 and <br />their composition varied each year (Figure 9). Speckled dace were the most <br />commonly collected native small-bodied species and redside shiner and sand shiner <br />were the most commonly collected nonnative species. Red shiner, fathead <br />minnow, and mottled sculpin composed a very small portion of small-bodied species <br />in both years. Creek chub and plains killifish were few and only collected in 1995. <br />The high proportion of native fishes found in the Little Snake River was unusual <br />compared to most Upper Colorado River Basin mainstream rivers that are typically <br />dominated by nonnative fishes lCarlson and Muth 1989, Hawkins and Nesler <br />1991); although, it was similar to the high percentage (72%) observed in the Price <br />River, a similar-sized tributary of the Green River (Cavalli 1999). <br /> <br />Species composition was relatively similar at all reaches even with wide <br />(> 34 km) separation of sites and different geomorphological conditions at each <br />site. The longitudinal differences of a few species were probably due to different <br />thermal tolerance, but for species that were more abundant in the lower reach their <br />abundance could also be due to infiltration from the Yampa River. Red shiner, a <br />warm-tolerant species, was more abundant in downstream reaches than it was in <br />cooler, upstream reaches. Cool tolerant, reds ide shiner, were more abundant in <br />cooler upstream sites and as water temperatures increased in autumn their <br />abundance declined. Abundance of most other species remained relatively constant <br />through all seasons showing that most species collected in the Little Snake River <br />could remain there as year-round residents. Although some individuals left the <br />Little Snake River, such as telemetered roundtail chub, humpback chub, and <br />Colorado pikeminnow, others apparently remained in the Little Snake River well <br />after runoff declined to base flow and when diel temperature fluctuations were <br />extreme. During baseflow, most refugia pools were isolated by impassible, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.