Laserfiche WebLink
<br />viii <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />J <br />j <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />ii' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />a <br />. <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The reasons for rarity of nonnative fishes in the Little Snake River compared <br />to other Upper Colorado River Basin rivers are unknown but regulating factors may <br />include extremely low baseflow, sediment laden spates during baseflow, high <br />suspended sediment load, or high amplitude of diel water temperatures during <br />baseflow. Understanding the relationship of these physico-chemical extremes and <br />fish community structure would assist in perpetuating native fish assemblages in <br />western river systems. Based on our results we recommend: <br />1. Identify and maintain the discharge and physico-chemical conditions in the <br />Little Snake River that support Colorado pikeminnow, humpback chub, and a <br />mostly native fish community. These conditions might include the timing, <br />magnitude, and pattern of runoff and baseflow and associated physico- <br />chemical conditions such as turbidity, diel temperature fluctuations, or <br />sediment load. <br />2. Better describe the migrations and interactions of humpback chub between <br />the Little Snake and Yampa rivers, possibly through intensive telemetry <br />studies. <br />3. Identify spawning sites for humpback chub that reside in the Yampa River <br />and Little Snake River. <br />4. Include humpback chub and Colorado pikeminnow that reside in the Little <br />Snake River with Yampa River abundance estimates. <br /> <br />Key words: Colorado pikeminnow, humpback chub, Little Snake River, native <br />fishes, nonnative fishes, removal population estimate, reproduction, <br />spawning, tributary. <br />