My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9509
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9509
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:43:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9509
Author
Hill, C. G.
Title
Dynamics of Northern Pike Spawning and Nursery Habitat in the Yampa River, Colorado.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />that could flush northern pike fry into the main channel. It has been well documented <br />that age-O pike are reliant upon vegetated nursery habitat for survival. Holland and <br />Huston (1984) found that age-O pike were 10 times more abundant in backwater areas <br />with vegetation compared to areas lacking vegetation. During a normal water year the <br />main channel of the Yampa River is devoid of calm, well vegetated areas, except for river <br />backwaters. We would expect that successful recruitment of age-O pike could only take <br />place if they are able to remain in these backwaters, or able to return to these areas after <br />being forced into the main channel. Large numbers of age-O pike were never found in the <br />main channel or in the backwaters, suggesting that recruitment from these Yampa River <br />habitats is limited. <br /> <br />Well-managed northern pike spawning marshes are capable of producing in <br />excess of 200 age-O northern pike per year per 557 m2 (Royer 1971). No riverine <br />spawning sites we investigated came close to producing this many pike. Age-O pike were <br />typically mobile and visible during electrofishing collections. The majority of <br />backwaters sampled had few age-O pike and few were observed during sampling. <br />Therefore, we do not believe a large number of age-O pike were present. The specific <br />sites we intensively sampled for age-O pike appeared to us to be the best sites available in <br />the entire study area. They were among the larger sites and were generally isolated from <br />the negative impacts of spring runoff flows. The combination of small spawning areas, <br />large water level fluctuations, and disruptive flows lead us to believe that the number of <br />successful backwater spawning locations on the Yampa River is very limited. <br /> <br />Nesler (1995) reported that over a four-year period of sampling with seines and <br />electrofishing between river mile 45.4 and 152.5 only 3 age-O northern pike were <br />collected, all from areas upstream of river mile 139 (Craig). Our sampling for age-O pike <br />in backwaters typically resulted in zero to 5 age-O pike in an entire sampling area, with <br />only a few occasions resulting in 10 to 25 age-O pike in an entire backwater. Overall, the <br />greatest numbers of age-O pike were found at the gravel pit pond site. Based on the <br />apparent stability of the gravel pit and other off channel ponds and their relative impunity <br />to variations in river flows, it is not surprising that the gravel pit pond would produce the <br />greatest number of age-O pike. The pond site we examined was less prone to water level <br />fluctuations than those sites more directly influenced by the Yampa River and was more <br />similar to stable lentic environments often associated with good northern pike habitat. <br /> <br />While our sampling of pond habitat only included one site, we believe that the <br />majority of successful northern pike recruitment takes place in off channel ponds. <br />Analysis of aerial photographs showed that there are as many as 72 such ponds totaling <br />about 158 ha along the Yampa River that are always open to the river or could be <br />connected during spring runoff. Most of these ponds are clustered near . Steamboat <br />Springs and Craig and typically are remnants of gravel mining operations. Ponds that are <br />connected to the river are likely sources of northern pike recruitment. The more isolated <br />ponds could also account for a significant infusion of age-O northern pike to the river if <br />they are deep enough to support over winter survival of adults. In such cases, young <br />northern pike could move into the river every few years when the spring flows are large <br />enough to connect the pond with the river.. We also found northern pike escaping from <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.