My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9509
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9509
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:43:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9509
Author
Hill, C. G.
Title
Dynamics of Northern Pike Spawning and Nursery Habitat in the Yampa River, Colorado.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
Fort Collins, Colorado.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />backwater spawmng habitats during the period when we observed northern pike <br />spawning. During 2003, water temperatures in the Yampa River near Hayden did not <br />reach 4.40 C until late March and did not consistently reach 7.80 C until early April. <br /> <br />An examination ofthe 1999 aerial photographs of the river indicated the existence <br />of more than 100 potential backwaters between Steamboat Springs and Craig. During <br />our on-the-ground investigations between Steamboat Springs and Craig, only 52 possible <br />spawning backwaters were identified. Some presumed backwaters in the 1999 photos <br />probably no longer existed, were active side channels or dry, or were misidentified from <br />irrigation ditches. During sampling for age-O pike in 2002 and 2003, backwaters smaller <br />than 557 m2 had few fish and never more than 10 age-O pike on a single sampling <br />occasion. Therefore, backwaters that were smaller than this size were deemed <br />unproductive sites for northern pike recruitment. Nineteen of the 52 sites were smaller <br />than 557 m2 and would be expected to contribute very few age-O pike. Of the remaining <br />33 larger sites, 8 showed signs of flushing flow effects from spring runoff, 13 showed <br />some signs of flow effects, and 12 showed no signs of flushing flow impacts (Figure 4). <br />The 12 backwaters larger than 557 m2 that showed no signs of flushing flow impacts <br />from spring runoff and the 5 backwaters larger than 557 m2 that showed some signs of <br />flow effects and were "perpendicular" to the main channel with only one point of <br />connection to riverine flows were considered to be the best backwater spawning habitats <br />available. <br /> <br />Regressions of depth vs. flow were based on 9 to 14 data points depending on the <br />site, which resulted in r2 values between 0.94 and 0.99. Analysis of contour maps and <br />depth vs. flow information for each study site revealed that wetted area showed only a <br />small change between 2002 and 2003 during early April (April 1-15) even though the <br />spring runoff was dramatically different in the two years (Table 1). The site at river mile <br />155 was the only site that showed a dramatic change in wetted area, but this site had a <br />low floodplain separating the backwater from the river, which allowed for a large change <br />in area from a small change in water depth. Contour maps for this site during the peak <br />spring flow of 2002 and 2003 showed that this was the only site connected to the main <br />channel during both years. Two sites showed possible connection and the rest did not <br />show connection to the main channel during the peak spring runoff of 2002. During the <br />higher peak spring runoff in 2003 one site showed no connection, one site showed <br />possible connection and the rest were connected to the main channel during the spring <br />runoff. <br /> <br />Age-O northern pike were sampled at 11 sites during 2002 and 12 sites during <br />2003. The first sampling period was June 25-28, 2002 and June 24-27, 2003. The <br />second sampling period was July 10-11, 2002 and June 30-July 2, 2003. The third <br />sampling period was July 20-23, 2003. Five sites were dewatered before sampling began <br />in 2002, but age-O northern pike were found in the river adjacent to one dry site. Also <br />during 2002, most backwaters were dry by the end of July so the third period samples <br />were not collected. During 2003, one site was not sampled and one site dewatered during <br />the second sampling period and two additional sites dewatered before the third sampling <br />period. The CPUE information in 2002 shows a wide range in CPUE for backwater <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.