Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Methods <br /> <br />Assessment of spawning and nursery habitat characteristics <br />During 2002, four sites were sampled to determine when northern pike were using <br />the backwaters and when they spawn. A nylon seine with 38.1 mm mesh and leadcore <br />bottom line was stretched across the mouth of each backwater with two trapnets attached <br />to holes cut in the seine. Steel posts were installed on each bank and in the backwater to <br />secure the seine and trapnets. One trapnet collected fish moving into the backwater and <br />the other collected fish as they moved out of the backwater. Each northern pike caught <br />was tagged with an individually numbered t-post tag, weighed (lb, oz), measured (in), <br />checked for eggs or milt, and released in the backwater or in the main channel depending <br />on the direction it was moving. The seine/trapnets were installed on April 9-16, 2002 and <br />checked daily for five weeks. <br /> <br />Water temperatures were measured in the main river channel and in backwaters to <br />determine temperatures associated with pike spawning activity. Temperatures were <br />recorded with Onset Optic StowAway temperature loggers in the Yampa River at <br />Steamboat Springs (river mile 197), near Hayden (river mile 169.1), and near Craig (river <br />mile 137). Loggers were installed in the mouth of backwaters at river miles 174, 163.8, <br />and 163.3 and at the gravel pit pond at river mile 197 in early April 2002 and remained in <br />place throughout the study. Additional temperature loggers were installed at backwaters <br />at river miles 197.8 and 152.5 in April 2003. <br /> <br />Aerial photographs taken September 5, 1999 were analyzed to determine the <br />potential abundance of backwaters. The river was navigated by canoe from the west end <br />of Steamboat Springs to Craig to identify the location and distribution of backwater <br />spawning sites. A global positioning system was used to record the location of each <br />backwater. Habitat measurements at each site consisted of length and width <br />measurements, backwater orientation to the river, depth at mouth of the backwater, and <br />evidence that the backwater became part of the flowing channel during spring runoff. <br />Because spring runoff flows can seriously impact spawning habitat, we attempted to <br />categorize possible backwater spawning areas not only by size, but also by orientation to <br />the river and by visual signs that spawning habitat was exposed to flushing flows during <br />spring runoff. The bank separating the backwater from the river was assessed for the <br />presence of vegetation and bank composition to indicate whether the backwater became a <br />flowing side channel or was simply inundated during spring runoff. The presence of <br />vegetation and dirt banks indicate that the backwater probably was not often part of the <br />flowing channel during spring runoff, while a predominantly cobble bank that lacked <br />vegetation indicated that the backwater probably experienced flushing flows during <br />spring runoff. A combination of vegetation characteristics and bank composition, <br />intermediate between the two previous categories was used as an indication that the <br />backwater was exposed to main channel flows intermittently. <br /> <br />Depth gages were installed at nine backwater sites to record changes in water <br />level over the spawning and nursery period. Depth gage readings were recorded during <br />April, May, and June. Because river flows reported at USGS gage stations located at <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />