My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9520
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9520
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:42:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9520
Author
Haines, G. B., D. Irving and T. Modde.
Title
White River Base Flow Study for Endangered Fishes, Colorado and Utah, 1995-1996.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
5D,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />interpretations and lead to confusion. The study would have benefitted from current site specific <br /> <br />curves. <br /> <br />The greatest shortcoming was that the study design should have included seasonal flows <br /> <br /> <br />and fish habitat use, not just base flows. Although a geomorphology study, "Geomorphic analysis <br /> <br />in support of a channel maintenance flow recommendation for the White River near Watson, <br /> <br />Utah," was conducted to address flood flow during spring runoff, the biology component was <br /> <br />limited to the base flow period. Most of the results from this study were based on the wetted <br /> <br />perimeter-discharge relation. The Instream Flow Council (2002) has admonished researchers to <br /> <br />move away from the use anyone tool and toward the use of a suite of methods. <br /> <br />Colorado pikeminnow Flow Requirements in the White River <br /> <br />Despite the uncertainties and shortcomings above, we make the following comments on <br /> <br />the flow requirements. Adult Colorado pikeminnow occupy the White River year-round. The fish <br /> <br />undergo spawning migrations of hundreds of miles to sites in the Yampa and Green rivers. <br /> <br /> <br />Typically, sexually mature fish migrate out the White River by mid-Mayor mid June and return by <br /> <br /> <br />mid- to late August (Irving and Modde 2000). The downstream migration is thought to be cued <br /> <br /> <br />by descending spring runoff flows and temperature(Tyus 1990, Modde and Smith 1995). Fish <br /> <br /> <br />passage over shallow riffles is dependent on adequate flow, especially for the return trip in <br /> <br /> <br />August. Maximum riffle production occurs during base flow period in summer and early autumn, <br /> <br /> <br />which supports the prey of Colorado pikeminnow. <br />Multiple flow levels are required to meet the needs of the White River Colorado <br /> <br /> <br />pikeminnow. To cue the fish to migrate, a natural hydrograph is needed during spring runoff To <br /> <br /> <br />provide for passage over riffles, flows >300 cfs are apparently needed. To maintain riffle <br /> <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.