My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9520
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9520
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:42:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9520
Author
Haines, G. B., D. Irving and T. Modde.
Title
White River Base Flow Study for Endangered Fishes, Colorado and Utah, 1995-1996.
USFW Year
2004.
USFW - Doc Type
5D,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />and cross section 10401 for linear relation). We classified 32 of 42 riflle transects as having curve <br /> <br /> <br />breaks and 10 as linear and therefore no curve break (Table 4). Curve break discharges ranged <br /> <br /> <br />from 80 to 200 cfs and averaged 161 cfs. The curve breaks covered, on average, 77% of the riffle <br /> <br /> <br />wetted perimeter (range 34-95%). The riflle mean wetted perimeter-discharge relation was <br /> <br /> <br />slightly non-linear and increased most rapidly with discharge between 1 and 150 cfs and then <br /> <br />gradually approached a plateau near 500 cfs before again increasing at 550 cfs (Figure 8). <br /> <br /> <br />Because of the approximate linear nature of the relation, no curve break was determined. <br /> <br />The total rifIle surface area-discharge relationship was nearly linear for all flows examined <br /> <br /> <br />(Figure 9), and thus no curve break point was produced. <br /> <br />Curve breaks were also calculated for width, depth, and velocity (Appendix 5). The mean <br /> <br />curve break point for riflle and run width was 155 cfs, depth 152 cfs, and velocity 131 cfs. <br /> <br />WUA vs. Discharge <br /> <br /> <br />WUA was calculated for three sets of criteria for each ofthe three experimental flows. All <br /> <br />three criteria showed approximate linear relations for the discharges examined (339,424, and 552 <br /> <br />cfs; Table 5). Appendix 6 gives a detailed breakdown for each habitat cluster at discharge 339 <br /> <br />cfs. <br /> <br />We modeled the WUA-discharge relation between 1 and 600 cfs (Figure 10). The first <br /> <br /> <br />criterion was that developed :from the White River data. It showed an almost linear increase in <br /> <br /> <br />WUA as flows increased from 10 to 600 cfs. The second criterion was the night foraging data <br /> <br /> <br />:from the Yampa River. It showed WU A score almost identical to the White River data. This was <br /> <br /> <br />the result of very similar HSI data sets for both depth and velocity. The third criterion was for <br /> <br /> <br />diurnal resting fish, also developed :from Yampa River data. This showed very low WUA score <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.