Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Although U. S. Geological Survey flow records for August and <br />September were not available for inclusion in this report, flow levels <br />of the Green River appeared lower than normal. It is quite probable <br />that the low water year experienced in 1977 caused a reduction in river <br />flow. Personal observation indicated the Yampa River was exceptionally <br />low. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The preferred depth, velocity, substrate, habitat type, and <br />temperature of the rare fishes are summarized as electivity curves (Fig- <br />ures 3-10). Colorado squawfish young-of-the-year were found only in back- <br />waters where there was no current, a firm silt bottom, and a depth of <br />one to two feet (Figure 3). Juvenile squawfish also preferred backwaters, <br />no current and a silt bottom, but were less selective with depth (Figure <br />4). Subadult and adult squawfish (200+ mm) were found in a variety of <br />velocities and depths, but preferred sandy bottomed eddies and runs to <br />backwaters (Figure 5). Squawfish of all sizes showed little preference <br />for temperature as they were found in almost the entire range of tempera- <br />tures encountered during the study (Figure 6). <br />The six young-of-the-year razorbacks collected showed a preference <br />for eddies with a velocity of about 0.2 fps (feet per second), a depth <br />of 1.0 foot, and a soft silt bottom. <br />Humpback chub young-of-the~year (Desolation and Gray canyons fishes) <br />were less selective of microhabitat than were yound squawfish. The young- <br />of-the-year chubs preferred backwaters with no current, a firm silt bottom, <br />and two feet of maximum depth, but also used deeper eddies and runs with <br />velocities from 0.4-0.8 fps (Figure 7). Juvenile humpback chubs used a <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />