Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />rather scattered and only six were captured. Three of these fish were <br />caught in a 3 mile section of river near Ouray, Utah. <br />Young-of-the-year razorback suckers were tentatively identified on <br />the basis of lateral line scales (80-88). Six were found in the middle <br />portion of the study area (Table 2). The only two razorback adults seen <br />during the study were also in this area. <br />The chubs (Gila) of Desolation and Gray canyons are distinctly <br />different from those collected near Jensen. Table 2 shows the decrease <br />in chubs, especially young-of-the-year, in the middle portion of the <br />study area. The Desolation and Gray canyons specimens seem to represent <br />a population distinct from the one near Jensen. Dorsal-anal fin ray <br />counts (9-9 and 9-10), a narrow caudal peduncle, an obvious nuchal hump <br />in adults, a rather flat head, and a tendency for a subterminal mouth <br />suggest the humpback chub, although the robustness of the fishes and the <br />slightness of the nuchal humping suggest the roundtail chub (Gila robusta) <br />(Appendix III). Until a more thorough analysis of these fishes is fin- <br />ished, the Desolation-Gray canyons specimens will be referred to as hump- <br />back chubs, except for one instance where the specimen appeared to be a <br />bony tail chub, as mentioned below. <br />One adult bony tail chub was collected in the upper portion of the <br />study area (Table 2; Appendix III). A juvenile chub was caught in Deso- <br />lation Canyon that had dorsal and anal fin ray counts of 10-10, and a <br />less obvious nuchal hump and flattened head than other chub specimens <br />from that area. These characteristics suggest the fish was a juvenile <br />bonyta il ch ub . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />