Laserfiche WebLink
<br />37 <br /> <br />a readily available food source for both young-of-the-year and juvenile <br />squawfish and it appears very likely that an abundance of these preferred <br />habitats may well increase the survival potential of young squawfish. <br /> <br />primarily from the standpoint of food availability, If this hypothesis <br /> <br />is correct, preferred habitat of Y.C>.!.lUg.,IJl~~Y, in fact, ~~ a limiting factor <br />~_, .,..,'_,.____,_"__..,,. ,_,. ~ -- ., - -'.' , ,..",.". \ ~ -. -'-'-",. ,-' ._".>.,"'Y-',">< <br /> <br />to rare fishes, especial1:vColaradQ squawfish. <br />The low water levels encountered during the study reduced the <br />available number of small backwaters from normal levels. A large number <br />of potential backwater situations were seen in the study area that, given <br /> <br />1-2 feet of additional flow, would have been preferred young squawfish <br />habitat. The cross-sectional data of Figures 12 and 13 indicate that <br />that particular area had certain depth and velocity categories present, <br />Very little preferred habitat (Figure 2) of young-of-the-year squawfish <br /> <br />was present, except in the backwater where they were found. Cross-sec- <br /> <br /> <br />tional data from other areas of young-of-the-year squawfish habitat would <br /> <br />provide comparative data. <br /> <br />Rare Fish Movements and Potential Spawning Areas <br /> <br />The three young-of-the-year squawfish recaptured in the sample <br />backwater provide little data on movement. The fact that a relatively <br />large number of fish were marked and that successive samples found re- <br />latively large numbers of unmarked fish, indicates several possibilities, <br />First, a fairly large population is indicated. Secondly, failure to re- <br />capture marked fish suggests either low sampling efficiency or absence of <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />