Laserfiche WebLink
<br />20 <br /> <br />variety of habitats, but preferred no current, a firm silt substrate, and <br /> <br />a depth of two feet (Figure 8). Adult humpback chubs were taken primarily <br /> <br />in eddies and runs with sand bottoms and a variety of velocities and <br />depths (Figure 9). Temperature did not appear to be selected by any size <br />of humpback chub (Figure 10). <br /> <br />Turbidity varied considerably during the study, and was highest after <br />rainstorms (Figure 11). There is considerable natural variation in the <br /> <br />turbidity levels of the Green River because the watershed is highly erod- <br />able. The native fishes seldom have the opportunity to select a preferred <br /> <br />turbidity as the entire river may change dramatically overnight. They <br />,.. - ~""., <br /> <br />are well adapted to sudden and extensive changes in turbidity, which are <br /> <br />usually associated with increases in flow. <br /> <br />River cross-sectional measurements of depth, velocity, and substrate <br /> <br />were taken around a backwater where young-of-the-year squawfish were abun- <br /> <br />dant. Figures 12 and 13 show the depth and velocity isolines of the area <br /> <br />measured. The area was quite deep, with steep, sloping banks and a well- <br /> <br />defined main current with slower areas near the shore. <br /> <br />Chemical Components <br />Graphs of water chemistry values recorded during the study can be <br /> <br />found in Appendix II. Green River water chemistry changed little during <br /> <br />the course of the study. Fluctuations of the various parameters are with- <br /> <br />in the normal expected range. Fishes seldom are able to select preferred <br /> <br />chemical ranges in the river as all habitats are very similar in chemical <br /> <br />analysis. <br />