My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9578
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9578
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:41:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9578
Author
Hamilton, S. J. and e. al.
Title
The Evaluation of Contaminant Impacts on Razorback Sucker Held in Flooded Bottomland Sites Near Grand Junction, Colorado - 1997.
USFW Year
2001.
USFW - Doc Type
CAP6-WW,
Copyright Material
NO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />5 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />lower Colorado River basin and reported selenium contamination throughout the upper and <br />lower Colorado River basin. He concluded that selenium concentrations Were sufficiently <br />elevated to be causing reproductive problems in endangered fish such as the razorback sucker. <br />In a follow-up paper, he reviewed historical data on selenium concentrations in the upper and <br />lower basins, along with historical records and reviews of the occurrence of native, later <br />endangered fish, and presented a hypothesis that suggested selenium contamination from <br />irrigated agriculture in the 1890-1910 period caused the decline of native fish in the upper basin <br />in the 1910-1920 period and in the lower basin in the 1925-1935.period (Hamilton 1999). <br />Although many of the studies reviewed in Hamilton (1998, 1999) documented elevated selenium <br />concentrations in various aquatic components, none of the studies assessed biological effects in <br />endangered fish from exposure to selenium or other inorganic elements. <br />In an effort to stabilize and enhance populations of razorback sucker and other <br />endangered fishes in the upper Colorado River, the Floodplain Habitat Restoration Program <br />within the Recovery Program undertook to restore floodplain habitats for use by razorback <br />sucker larvae and adults. The proposed strategy for achieving these goals was to reconnect <br />selected floodplain habitats to the main river channel in a manner that simulated historic <br />hydrological conditions. An important component of this Restoration Program was to select sites <br />that after restoration, would not pose contaminant problems to the fish, especially from selenium. <br />This study was conducted to derive the necessary toxicological information for assessing the <br />suitability of selected flooded bottomlands as habitat for razorback sucker. <br /> <br />Razorback sucker <br /> <br />The life history and status of the razorback sucker has been reviewed by Bestgen (1990). <br />Briefly, the razorback sucker was considered common in the upper and lower Colorado River <br />basins in historical times, but since the 1940's has become rare except for populations in the <br />Green River and Lakes Mead and Mohave. Razorback suckers are generally thought to inhabit <br />moderate to large streams and rivers and use a variety of habitats including low-velocity areas <br />(backwaters, sloughs, oxbow lakes), near-shore runs, and shallow channels adjacent to, or over, <br />mid-stream sandbars. The diet of razorback sucker varies depending on life stage, habitat, and <br />food availability, and the diet of adults in rivers may be different than adults in reservoirs. ' <br />Springtime congregations of razorback sucker have been found in off-channel impoundments <br />and tributaries. Spawning behavior of razorback sucker is apparently influence by water <br />temperature and flow (Tyus and Karp 1990), but Modde and Wick (1997) suggested that <br />increases in discharge probably have a greater influence on initiating fish movement in late <br />spring to spawning sites such as Razorback Bar in the Green River. <br />The remaining population of razorback sucker in the middle Green River basin in Utah <br />has been estimated, using similar datasets, at about 1,000 individuals in 1988 (Lanigan and Tyus <br />1989) and at 300 to 600 in 1992 (Modde et al. 1996). Razorback sucker are rare in the upper <br />Colorado River basin, where only 10 fish were found in the river between 1989 and 1996 (C. <br />McAda, USFWS, personal communication). <br />The present study was conducted at three sites near Grand Junction, CO, in the general <br />area where razorback sucker had historically been observed, i.e., the gravel pit at what is now <br />Walter Walker State Wildlife Area, or is currently held in hatchery ponds for propagation <br />purposes, i.e., Horsethief Canyon State Wildlife Area. Although wild fish are free to move about <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.