My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9641
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9641
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:40:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9641
Author
Hedrick, T. N., K. R. Bestgen and K. D. Christopherson.
Title
Entrainment of Semi-Buoyant Beads and Razorback Sucker, Xyrauchen texanus, Larvae into Flood Plain Wetlands of the Middle Green River, Utah.
USFW Year
2009.
USFW - Doc Type
C-6/RZ-ENTR,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />entrainment rates were highest at the second highest river flow stage and declined after that <br /> <br />(Tables 13 and 14, Figure 18). In addition, entrainment effectiveness (percentage of beads <br /> <br />captured in the breach vs. in the near shore nets) was also highest on the first sampling occasion, <br /> <br />before the peak (Table 14). We are not sure why this scenario would occur but assume it is due <br /> <br />to an anomalous bead distribution, erratic movement during entrainment, or breach elevation and <br /> <br />sediment dynamics. There is a large sandbar on river left that begins just upstream of Breach 2 <br /> <br />and it is possible that at lower flows, more entrainment can occur and that at higher flows, more <br /> <br />beads are swept away from the breaches with the thalweg. Flow entrainment at comparable river <br /> <br />flow levels on the ascending and descending limbs ofthe hydrograph were similar, again <br /> <br />suggesting that entrainment rates may not vary for flow-through wetlands whether they are <br /> <br />receiving water during the time when river stage is increasing or decreasing. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Implications for flood plain wetland management in the middle Green River <br /> <br />A logical discussion point for future management of flood plain wetlands is what <br /> <br />combination of flow-through and single breach types are needed to assist with recovery of <br /> <br />razorback sucker in the middle Green River. The evaluation ofthe Levee Removal Project <br /> <br />discussed numerous points regarding the elements of an ideal flood plain wetland (Birchell et al. <br /> <br />2002) and should be included in this discussion. These elements included: <br /> <br />. site configuration to maximize entrainment of drifting razorback sucker larvae; <br /> <br />. refuge from predation by native and nonnative predators; <br /> <br />. high productivity to allow rapid growth of razorback suckers; <br /> <br />. a lack of ability to produce nonnative fish; <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />49 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.