My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9641
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9641
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:40:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9641
Author
Hedrick, T. N., K. R. Bestgen and K. D. Christopherson.
Title
Entrainment of Semi-Buoyant Beads and Razorback Sucker, Xyrauchen texanus, Larvae into Flood Plain Wetlands of the Middle Green River, Utah.
USFW Year
2009.
USFW - Doc Type
C-6/RZ-ENTR,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />downstream. Because a large portion of fish may occur in the middle of the channel, we <br /> <br />determined that sampling should also occur there in future efforts to be able to detect their <br /> <br />presence. Also, releases larger than those in this test may allow for detections much further <br /> <br />downstream. Significantly, average drift rates of beads and larvae were similar (0.62 m/sec vs. <br /> <br />0.44 m/sec, respectively, for the 1.6 km site; 0.37 m/sec vs. 0.32 m/sec, respectively, for the 8 <br /> <br />km site). Total capture rates were also similar: 0.3% vs. 0.36% respectively for percent of <br /> <br />released materials captured. Although average transport rates were similar, larvae always arrived <br /> <br />more quickly than beads (likely a result of the larvae's ability to actively swim). This indicated <br /> <br />that beads may be a suitable surrogate for fish larvae, should larvae not be available for all test <br /> <br />releases in the future. <br /> <br />Cross-channel distribution of beads and marked larvae suggested little mixing over the 8 <br /> <br />km distance downstream of the release site because nearly all beads and marked larvae were <br /> <br />captured on the right side of the river. This may be explained at the 8 km site by the sharp left <br /> <br />turn in the river a short distance downstream from Razorback Bar that likely maintained most <br /> <br /> <br />drifting particles down the right side of the channel with the thalweg. However, our ability to <br /> <br /> <br />infer patterns of cross channel distribution of drift material in 2004 is limited due to a small <br /> <br /> <br />sample size (only one release this year) and uncertainty surrounding the exact release points. <br /> <br />Additional releases and additional sampling sites further downstream than 8 km from release <br /> <br />sites are needed to better assess mixing across the channel. <br /> <br />The few captures of marked larvae adjacent to breaches at the Thunder Ranch wetland <br /> <br />complex suggested that, at 2004 flow levels and channel dynamics, few larvae from Razorback <br /> <br />Bar would be available for entrainment, even if the breaches had connected to the main channel <br /> <br />at these flow levels. Flow dynamics and entrainment rates of additional wild-produced larvae in <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />34 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.