My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9641
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9641
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:37 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 4:40:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9641
Author
Hedrick, T. N., K. R. Bestgen and K. D. Christopherson.
Title
Entrainment of Semi-Buoyant Beads and Razorback Sucker, Xyrauchen texanus, Larvae into Flood Plain Wetlands of the Middle Green River, Utah.
USFW Year
2009.
USFW - Doc Type
C-6/RZ-ENTR,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />expensive than reagent grade TC, commercially available TC was used for fish marking that <br /> <br /> <br />year. A 6.2 gram amount ofTC was dissolved in 800 milliliter (ml) of deionized water and was <br /> <br /> <br />sufficient to achieve a marking solution of350 mg/L, when added to the 19 liter (L) of water in <br /> <br /> <br />the marking container. The solution was buffered with tris (Trizma hydrochloride, Sigma <br /> <br /> <br />Chemical T-3253), a few grains at a time, to a pH of about 7.0. After acclimation, the TC <br /> <br /> <br />solution was added to the marking container and gently mixed. Fish were immersed in the <br /> <br />marking solution for four to five hr, a time sufficient to mark otoliths at those concentrations <br /> <br />(Muth and Meismer 1995). A small amount of air or oxygen was bubbled through the marking <br /> <br />solution; over-aeration produces excess foam. The solution was flushed to a waste drain (not <br /> <br /> <br />recirculated because antibiotic TC may affect biofilters in the hatchery) and fish were put back <br /> <br /> <br />into holding tanks. A few (about 10) larvae were preserved in 100% ethanol just post-marking <br /> <br /> <br />and then again two to three days later to ensure that fish were adequately marked. Examination <br /> <br />of otoliths of fish immersed in the TC solution showed that 100% of fish were marked and marks <br /> <br /> <br />were bright yellow and clear (Muth and Bestgen 1991). In 2005, we double-marked one batch of <br /> <br /> <br />larvae so that fish from different release batches could be differentiated after capture in the wild. <br /> <br /> <br />This was accomplished by conducting the standard marking at eight days post-hatch, followed by <br /> <br />another mark application at 11 days post-hatch. The three-day interval was sufficient to allow <br /> <br />for the marks to be spatially well-separated (not overlapping) on the otolith. Number of larvae <br /> <br />released was estimated volumetric ally in the hatchery; larvae were placed in plastic bags with a <br /> <br />large headspace of oxygen, and transported to release sites the morning of releases. <br /> <br />In 2005, based on our recommendation, hatchery personnel attempted to mark a batch of <br /> <br />razorback sucker larvae with alizarin complexone (AC), a compound successfully used in other <br /> <br />marking studies that produces a fluorescent red mark (Muth and Meismer 1995). We attempted <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.